VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BMW X3 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 398 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 51,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or BMW X3?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs BMW X3: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly more electric range
details

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q4 e-tron

As the automotive world increasingly leans toward electrification, the competition between luxury SUVs is heating up. Two contenders that have garnered considerable attention are the Audi Q4 e-tron and the BMW X3. Both vehicles encapsulate their respective brands' ethos while presenting innovative technology and impressive performance. In this article, we’ll delve into a detailed comparison of these two premium SUVs, focusing on their technical aspects and innovations.

X3

Design and Dimensions

The Audi Q4 e-tron showcases a sleek, futuristic design typical of Audi's aesthetics. Measuring 4588 mm in length, 1865 mm in width, and 1632 mm in height, the Q4 e-tron has a confident stance that speaks to its electric heritage. On the other hand, the BMW X3, slightly larger at 4708 mm long, 1891 mm wide, and 1676 mm high, embodies a more robust and muscular appearance, aligning with BMW's signature design language.

Q4 e-tron

Powertrains and Performance

The Audi Q4 e-tron offers an all-electric lineup, featuring a range of power outputs from 170 HP up to 340 HP with its all-wheel-drive variants. The performance figures are impressive, with a maximum torque reaching 679 Nm and acceleration times as brisk as 5.4 seconds for the sporty versions. Its electric range also commands attention, with capabilities of up to 554 km on a full charge, ensuring that range anxiety remains a thing of the past.

In contrast, the BMW X3 boasts a versatile range, incorporating petrol, diesel, and hybrid options. With power levels spanning from 184 HP up to a staggering 510 HP in its high-performance variants, the X3 caters to a broader audience. Although its fuel-powered engines lack the range of the Q4 e-tron, they still deliver robust performance with rapid acceleration times, such as a mere 3.8 seconds for the top-performing model. The X3's hybrid models offer limited electric range, peaking at 90 km, suitable for short commutes.

X3

Efficiency and Sustainability

When it comes to efficiency, the Audi Q4 e-tron excels with an energy consumption rating between 15.9 to 17.4 kWh per 100 km. This remarkable efficiency is a step toward sustainable transportation, aligning with modern eco-conscious consumer expectations. With zero tailpipe emissions, the Q4 e-tron makes a statement about Audi’s commitment to sustainability.

The BMW X3, while not fully electric, integrates advanced hybrid technologies. The plug-in hybrid models have a lower consumption rate, some as efficient as 0.9 liters per 100 km, making it appealing for those looking for a combination of traditional power and electric assistance. However, it does have CO2 emissions that range from 21 to 246 g/km, which could be a consideration for environmentally conscious buyers.

Q4 e-tron

Interior and Technology

Stepping inside the Audi Q4 e-tron reveals a modern and minimalistic cabin that places a strong emphasis on technology. With a spacious interior for up to five passengers, the Q4 e-tron is equipped with a cutting-edge infotainment system, featuring a high-resolution touchscreen, advanced voice recognition, and driver-assistance systems. The cargo capacity measures at 520 liters, allowing ample space for everyday needs.

The BMW X3 promotes a driver-focused interior filled with premium materials and a more conventional aesthetic. The infotainment system is equally advanced with large display screens and optional gesture control. Passengers also enjoy generous legroom and luggage space, with trunk capacities reaching up to 570 liters, aiding practical daily usability.

X3

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the BMW X3 depends on what you value in an SUV. If eco-friendliness, cutting-edge electric technology, and a sleek design are your priorities, the Q4 e-tron stands out as a formidable option. Alternatively, for those who favor versatility, driving dynamics, and a broader range of powertrain options, the BMW X3 holds a strong allure.

As the automotive landscape continues to evolve, both models showcase the direction luxury SUVs are heading towards, combining performance with innovative technology and sustainability.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,971 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers significantly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 504 km more than the BMW X3.

X3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers a bit more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers only slightly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BMW X3 is barely lighter – 1,930 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 105 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X3 offers very slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.

When it comes to payload, the BMW X3 carries very slightly more – 570 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 440 - 592 km
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW X3

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details

BMW X3

The BMW X3 blends sporty handling with premium comfort, making it a strong choice for drivers who want an engaging everyday SUV. Its well-appointed interior and confident road manners give it broad appeal for families and commuters who value style and versatility.

details
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW X3

Costs and Consumption

Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
51,700 - 73,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
88 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
64 - 175 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
570 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
BMW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.