Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Jeep Compass comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 225 HP), boot space and price (39,600 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Jeep Compass?
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Jeep Compass: Key differences
Q4 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Jeep Compass is slightly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,357 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 17.5 kWh/100km for the Jeep Compass. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 554 km, about 54 km more than the Jeep Compass.
Compass
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers visibly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 225 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Jeep Compass takes 8 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Jeep Compass is very slightly faster – reaching 188 km/h, while the Audi Q4 e-tron tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 334 Nm more.
Q4 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Compass is noticeably lighter – 1,667 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 368 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers marginally more boot space – 550 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Jeep Compass offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,561 L, about 71 L more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,600
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
Jeep Compass
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
Jeep Compass
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Jeep Compass
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,600 - 58,800 £
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
|
Length
4,588 mm
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
1,614 - 1,632 mm
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,460 - 1,490 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Jeep
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.