Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-5 comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 141 HP), boot space and price (39,600 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Mazda CX-5?
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-5: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q4 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,566 £.
CX-5
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 199 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is very slightly faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Audi Q4 e-tron tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 441 Nm more.
Q4 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is noticeably lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 406 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers marginally more boot space – 583 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 offers noticeably more capacity – up to 2,019 L, about 529 L more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries moderately more – 601 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 86 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,600
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda CX-5
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
Mazda CX-5
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mazda CX-5
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
39,600 - 58,800 £
|
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
406 - 554 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
77 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
157 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
|
|
Length
4,588 mm
|
Length
4,690 mm
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,614 - 1,632 mm
|
Height
1,695 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,460 - 1,490 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
601 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.