What drive types are available for the Audi Q4 e-tron?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Audi Q4 e-tron deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers up to 340 HP.

What is the Audi Q4 e-tron’s energy consumption?

According to the manufacturer, the Audi Q4 e-tron requires 15.90 kWh.

How far can the Audi Q4 e-tron go on a full charge?

The WLTP range is up to 554 km.

How large is the Audi Q4 e-tron’s battery?

The battery capacity is 77 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Audi Q4 e-tron?

The Audi Q4 e-tron reaches up to 180 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Audi Q4 e-tron?

Length 4588 mm, width 1865 mm, height 1632 mm – those are the dimensions of the Audi Q4 e-tron.

What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-5's engine?

Up to 141 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-5 according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 7 L.

What is the top speed of the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on the model, top speed is 195 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-5?

Depending on configuration, up to 583 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-5?

The Mazda CX-5 measures 4690 mm long, 1860 mm wide and 1695 mm high.

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mazda CX-5 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 39600 £. That’s a price difference of around 9557 £.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron has a decisively edge – offering 340 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 199 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 5.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-5 performs barely noticeable better – reaching 195 km/h, while the Audi Q4 e-tron tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q4 e-tron pulls decisively stronger with 679 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 441 Nm difference.

Q4 e-tron @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is evident lighter – 1629 kg compared to 2035 kg. The difference is around 406 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers slight more room – 583 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 48 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs distinct better – up to 2019 L, which is about 529 L more than the Audi Q4 e-tron.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi Q4 e-tron shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.9 (20 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

In the compact EV SUV showdown, the Audi Q4 e‑tron leans into classy understatement with a roomier, more refined interior and a smoother, long-distance friendly ride. The BMW iX1, meanwhile, trades some comfort for sportier handling and a livelier, driver-focused feel—pick the Q4 for comfort and …

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-5

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Karoq

VS

The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …

Costs and Consumption
Price 39600 - 58800 £	Price 30000 - 39500 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km 7 - 7.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 - 17.4 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 406 - 554 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 59 - 77 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 g/km	co2 157 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 56 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2035 - 2235 kg	Curb weight 1629 - 1671 kg
Trunk capacity 520 - 535 L	Trunk capacity 583 L
Length 4588 mm	Length 4690 mm
Width 1865 mm	Width 1860 mm
Height 1614 - 1632 mm	Height 1695 mm
Max trunk capacity 1460 - 1490 L	Max trunk capacity 2019 L
Payload 505 - 515 kg	Payload -

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 204 - 340 HP	Power HP 141 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.5 - 10.9 s
Max Speed 160 - 180 km/h	Max Speed 195 km/h
Torque 310 - 679 Nm	Torque 238 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 150 - 250 kW	Power kW 104 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity 2488 cm3