Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mercedes Citan Transporter comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 21,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Mercedes Citan Transporter?
Audi Q4 e-tron vs Mercedes Citan Transporter: Key differences
Q4 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes Citan Transporter is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,700 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,973 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is markedly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.7 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Citan Transporter. That’s a difference of about 3.9 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers considerably more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 302 km more than the Mercedes Citan Transporter.
Citan Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers substantially more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 209 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.7 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm more.
Q4 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan Transporter is clearly lighter – 1,381 kg compared to 2,035 kg. The difference is around 654 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Citan Transporter carries clearly more – 787 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 272 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q4 e-tron holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £40,700
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q4 e-tron
The Audi Q4 e-tron brings Audi polish into the electric crossover scene, pairing a sleek exterior with a refined, airy interior that makes everyday driving feel distinctly premium. It’s an easy-to-live-with EV that balances comfort and real-world usability with intuitive tech, making it a smart choice for buyers who want electric mobility without giving up Audi character — and yes, it still looks good in the driveway.
details
Mercedes Citan Transporter
The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
|
Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
|
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 156 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
|
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
|
Width
1,865 mm
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
|
|
Payload
505 - 515 kg
|
Payload
449 - 787 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.