In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q5 and Volvo XC40 stand out for their distinctive strengths. While the Q5 impresses with its luxurious interior and dynamic performance, the XC40 offers a more playful design and a strong emphasis on safety and practicality. Ultimately, the choice between these two premium SUVs comes down to personal preference, balancing style with functionality.
In the competitive landscape of luxury compact SUVs, the Audi Q5 and Volvo XC40 stand out as two premium choices. Both vehicles offer a unique blend of performance, technology, and comfort, appealing to discerning drivers. This comparison will delve into technical specifications and innovations that set these two SUVs apart, helping potential buyers make an informed decision.
The Audi Q5 boasts a diverse engine lineup that includes diesel MHEV, petrol MHEV, and plug-in hybrid options. Engine performance ranges from 163 hp to a powerful 367 hp, allowing for a generous choice depending on driving preferences. With a quick acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as low as 4.5 seconds, the Q5 demonstrates raw power paired with efficiency, delivering a consumption rate as low as 5.6 L/100km.
In contrast, the Volvo XC40 focuses solely on petrol MHEV powertrains with outputs ranging from 163 hp to 197 hp. With a slightly slower acceleration time of 7.6 seconds for the more powerful variant, the XC40 achieves a commendable fuel consumption of around 6.5 L/100km. Despite being less potent than the Q5, the XC40’s performance is robust, making it suitable for urban and rural driving alike.
Both SUVs feature automatic transmission systems with dual-clutch technology, ensuring smooth and responsive gear shifts. The Audi Q5 offers versatility with available all-wheel drive (AWD) and front-wheel drive configurations, catering to diverse driving conditions. The XC40, however, is limited to front-wheel drive, which might restrict its off-road capabilities compared to the more agile Q5.
When it comes to dimensions, the Audi Q5 is notably larger, measuring 4717 mm in length and 1900 mm in width, while the Volvo XC40 is more compact at 4425 mm in length and 1863 mm wide. This translates into a more spacious interior and trunk capacity in the Q5, offering up to 520 liters compared to XC40’s 452 liters. Both models comfortably accommodate five passengers, but the Q5 allows for more legroom and cargo space, making it ideal for family outings and longer trips.
Two of the most important aspects in the modern SUV market are safety and technology integration. The Q5 showcases cutting-edge technology with its Virtual Cockpit, which replaces traditional gauge displays with a fully digital interface that offers navigation, media, and driver assistance features directly within the driver’s line of sight. Furthermore, the Audi connect services offer enhanced connectivity, delivering real-time information to drivers.
The Volvo XC40 leans heavily on its Scandinavian roots, marrying safety with practicality. The XC40 is equipped with advanced safety systems like Pilot Assist and City Safety, which include features such as lane-keeping assistance and automatic emergency braking. Additionally, the infotainment system is built around Google’s Android platform, delivering user-friendly technology that seamlessly integrates with smartphones.
When examining CO2 emissions, the XC40 has an edge with lower emissions ranging from 147 to 148 g/km, affirming Volvo's commitment to environmental sustainability. The Q5, while more powerful, emits between 146 to 213 g/km depending on the specific engine variant chosen. For eco-conscious buyers, both brands offer hybrid solutions that lower the carbon footprint while maintaining performance.
The decision between the Audi Q5 and Volvo XC40 fundamentally rests on individual preferences. The Q5 shines with its superior engine options, spacious interior, and advanced technological innovations, making it the better choice for those prioritizing performance and space. Meanwhile, the XC40 stands out for buyers seeking a compact SUV that emphasizes safety, environmental considerations, and a user-friendly tech interface.
Ultimately, both vehicles present unique advantages that can cater to varying lifestyles and driving needs, ensuring that shoppers can find a premium SUV that perfectly fits their requirements.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 42800 - 78900
£
|
Price
about 36400 - 46000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
61 - 62
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.4
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
35 - 213
g/km
|
co2
147 - 148
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 - 70
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1810 - 2150
kg
|
Curb weight
1688
kg
|
Trunk capacity
455 - 520
L
|
Trunk capacity
452
L
|
Length
4682 - 4717
mm
|
Length
4425
mm
|
Width
1893 - 1900
mm
|
Width
1863
mm
|
Height
1633 - 1662
mm
|
Height
1652
mm
|
Payload
495 - 630
kg
|
Payload
532
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
163 - 367
HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 9
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6
s
|
Max Speed
213 - 250
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
320 - 700
Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
120 - 270
kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145
kW
|
Engine capacity
1968 - 2995
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
213 - 250
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.