Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Dacia Spring comparison
Compare performance (490 HP vs 102 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 14,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Dacia Spring?
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Dacia Spring: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Dacia Spring is clearly cheaper – starting at 14,500 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,943 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Dacia Spring is visibly more efficient: consuming 12.4 kWh/100km compared to 15.4 kWh/100km for the Audi Q6 e-tron. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers significantly more range – reaching up to 668 km, about 443 km more than the Dacia Spring.
Spring
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers substantially more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 102 HP. That’s roughly 388 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Dacia Spring takes 9.6 s. That’s about 5.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers significantly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 137 Nm. That’s about 718 Nm more.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Audi Q6 e-tron offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Dacia Spring is significantly lighter – 1,070 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 1,130 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers clearly more boot space – 526 L compared to 308 L. That’s a difference of about 218 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries substantially more – 540 kg compared to 274 kg. That’s a difference of about 266 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q6 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £54,400
Audi Q6 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
Dacia Spring
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q6 e-tron
The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.
details
Dacia Spring
The Dacia Spring is an unpretentious city electric that strips EV ownership down to the essentials, offering clean, fuss-free transport for daily urban life. It won't impress luxury-seekers, but its cheerful practicality and rock-bottom running costs make it a clever, no-nonsense choice for anyone who wants electric mobility without the drama.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Dacia Spring
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
|
Price
14,500 - 16,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
12.4 - 12.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
|
Electric Range
221 - 225 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
|
Curb weight
1,070 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
308 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
|
Width
1,583 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
274 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
70 - 102 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
137 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
52 - 75 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Dacia
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.