VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 40,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Honda CR-V?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Honda CR-V

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Honda CR-V is markedly cheaper – starting at 40,200 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,228 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers considerably more range – reaching up to 668 km, about 590 km more than the Honda CR-V.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 306 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 855 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 520 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda CR-V is markedly lighter – 1,821 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 379 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers slightly more boot space – 617 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries somewhat more – 540 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX60
VS
The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
The Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V are close relatives but aim at different buyers: the CR-V emphasizes roomy comfort and family-friendly practicality, while the ZR-V focuses on a more compact, engaging package for urban and active drivers. This comparison will run through size, driving character, fuel …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details
A242848_medium
A242855_medium
A244272_medium

Reviews Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Monika
6 Nov 2025, 16:29:37

A slightly inflated price relative to the equipment included in this car.

Bula
11 Oct 2025, 08:59:08

Comfortable, but feels a bit firmer (over small bumps) than the Q5. You can tell the car has some heft!! The electric power — 388 PS / 285 kW BEV — is incredible. The battery drops pretty quickly if you push the beast a little. The advertised 600 km range is generous on paper; expect more like 500, or even 450 in winter. The onboard technology is surprising and pushed to the extreme. After trying it, it's hard to go back to a non-electric model.

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Henk van der Werf
1 Jun 2026, 20:15:51

The fuel economy you report in your test is, of course, nonsense. This is a plug-in, and so you're being fooled. Of course a CR‑V isn't more economical than an HR‑V. Think!

Roger
23 May 2026, 22:21:51

My 2026 CR‑V hybrid has had no problems. It’s quieter than my previous 2019 RAV4 hybrid. The exterior finish feels more solid across the whole vehicle. It’s less affected by crosswinds. I prefer the CR‑V’s driving. Its only drawback is that it uses just a little more fuel than the RAV4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marek
19 May 2026, 07:08:56

Very comfortable, lots of space, combined fuel consumption about 6 l, reliable, simple to operate, without unnecessary gadgets, very well made, easy to drive, a car for the city and long trips.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q5
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q5 is a well-rounded mid-size SUV that blends comfort, practicality and conventional petrol/diesel (or mild-hybrid) powertrains; the Audi Q6 e-tron is Audi’s fully electric premium SUV focused on range, advanced tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Choosing between them comes down to …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron and BMW iX3 represent two different takes on the premium electric SUV: the Q6 e-tron focuses on advanced tech and long-range efficiency, while the iX3 emphasizes BMW’s driving dynamics and familiar refinement. Below I’ll compare their range, performance, interior quality and …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron and the Mercedes GLC represent two different takes on luxury midsize SUVs: the Q6 e-tron is Audi’s all-electric, tech-forward offering while the GLC is Mercedes’ established compact-luxury SUV available in conventional and electrified drivetrains. Choosing between them comes down …
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
The Honda CR-V and Lexus NX are two of the most sensible compact crossovers on the market—one prized for roomy practicality and strong value, the other for luxury, refinement and a more premium driving experience. This comparison shows how the CR-V’s efficient, user-friendly package stacks up …
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and the Audi Q6 e-tron bring electric power to two distinct Audi philosophies: the Avant offers a low, aerodynamic touring wagon focused on efficiency and luggage capacity, while the Q6 e-tron is a higher-riding SUV that emphasizes space, visibility and everyday …
Audi Q6 e-tron
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Audi Q6 e-tron and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits two premium electric SUVs that blend luxury, technology and everyday practicality. If you're choosing between the Q6 e-tron and the GLC EQ, this comparison will walk through driving dynamics, range, interior comfort and value to help you …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and Audi Q6 e-tron are Audi’s electric SUV siblings: the compact Q4 emphasizes city-friendly size and efficiency, while the Q6 moves upmarket with more interior space, range and advanced tech. This side‑by‑side comparison will show whether the Q4’s agility and value or the Q6’s …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
40,200 - 48,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Honda
What drive types are available for the Audi Q6 e-tron?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.