@ Audi AG
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mazda CX-60 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (490 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 41900 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Mazda CX-60?

Audi Q6 e-tron

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54400 £. That’s a price difference of around 12523 £.

As for range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs decisively better – achieving up to 656 km, about 592 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron has a distinct edge – offering 490 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs barely noticeable better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 11 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls noticeable stronger with 855 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm difference.

Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is a bit lighter – 1890 kg compared to 2200 kg. The difference is around 310 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers slight more room – 570 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs a bit better – up to 1726 L, which is about 197 L more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 72 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Audi Q6 e-tron shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £54,400
Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.6 - 18.9 kWh
  • Electric Range : 482 - 656 km
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.

details
A242848_medium @ Audi AG
A242855_medium @ Audi AG
A244272_medium @ Audi AG

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Reviews Audi Q6 e-tron

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX3
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron is a tech-drenched grand tourer with a hushed cabin and long-range ambitions, while the BMW iX3 is a down-to-earth EV that favours agility, efficiency and sensible value. If you crave futuristic luxury and motorway composure, go Q6 e-tron; if you want sharper handling, everyday …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mazda CX-60
Q6 e-tron @ Audi AG
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
54400 - 91900 £
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
Electric Range
64 km
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
31 - 139 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4771 mm
Length
4745 mm
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Payload
540 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Audi AG
Audi Q4 e-tron
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron is the tidy, city-smart EV that slips into tight parking spots, delivers sensible range and a friendly price, while the Audi Q6 e-tron turns up the luxury, space and tech — essentially a grown-up Q4 with more ambition and a bigger bill. Choose the Q4 for efficient, no-nonsense …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
@ BMW Group Press
BMW iX
VS
The Audi Q6 e-tron feels like a precision-engineered salon on wheels—sleeker, more driver-focused, with crisp handling and an interior that whispers luxury rather than shouts it. The BMW iX is the bigger, bolder statement: cavernous, supremely comfortable and range-minded; pick the Q6 for the …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
@ Audi AG
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
VS
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant and Audi Q6 e-tron present two compelling visions of electric mobility, each catering to different lifestyles. While the A6 e-tron Avant boasts a sleek and sophisticated design ideal for those seeking a blend of performance and utility, the Q6 e-tron offers a more rugged, …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q6 e-tron
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Enyaq
VS
In a battle for supremacy in the electric SUV segment, the Audi Q6 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq shine with distinct qualities. The Audi Q6 e-tron impresses with its luxurious build, innovative tech features, and exhilarating performance, catering to premium seekers. In contrast, the Skoda Enyaq offers …
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.