VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Mitsubishi Outlander?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Outlander is visibly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,580 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers significantly more range – reaching up to 668 km, about 583 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Outlander

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers clearly more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Outlander is barely lighter – 2,156 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 44 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers barely more boot space – 526 L compared to 498 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q6 e-tron carries barely more – 540 kg compared to 529 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details

Mitsubishi Outlander

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
60 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
498 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,862 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
540 kg
Payload
453 - 529 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.