VS

Audi Q6 e-tron vs SsangYong Rexton comparison

Compare performance (490 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (54,400 £ vs 41,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or SsangYong Rexton?

Audi Q6 e-tron vs SsangYong Rexton: Key differences

Audi Q6 e-tron

4.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

SsangYong Rexton

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q6 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

SsangYong Rexton is visibly cheaper – starting at 41,100 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,294 £.

Rexton

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers considerably more power – delivering 490 HP compared to 202 HP. That’s roughly 288 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the SsangYong Rexton takes 10.6 s. That’s about 6.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q6 e-tron delivers clearly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 441 Nm. That’s about 414 Nm more.

Q6 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: SsangYong Rexton offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Rexton is very slightly lighter – 2,145 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Rexton offers markedly more boot space – 784 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 258 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Rexton carries clearly more – 770 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 230 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q6 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km
Audi Q6 e-tron
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q6 e-tron

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

details

SsangYong Rexton

The SsangYong Rexton is a no-nonsense full-size SUV that pairs rugged, go-anywhere bones with a surprisingly plush cabin, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want capability without premium-brand prices. It won’t turn heads like a luxury badge, but its generous space, sensible features and honest practicality make it a smart, down-to-earth family hauler — a savvy pick if you value substance over status.

details
Audi Q6 e-tron
SsangYong Rexton

Costs and Consumption

Price
54,400 - 82,500 £
Price
41,100 - 51,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
535 - 668 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
214 - 216 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
70 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,425 kg
Curb weight
2,145 - 2,180 kg
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
Trunk capacity
236 - 784 L
Length
-
Length
4,850 mm
Width
1,939 - 1,965 mm
Width
1,960 mm
Height
-
Height
1,825 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,806 - 1,977 L
Payload
540 kg
Payload
655 - 770 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
Power HP
202 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
184 km/h
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
Torque
441 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
Power kW
148 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,021 - 2,023
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Audi
Brand
SsangYong
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.