VS

Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander comparison

Compare performance (503 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (65,100 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q8 e-tron or Mitsubishi Outlander?

Audi Q8 e-tron vs Mitsubishi Outlander: Key differences

Audi Q8 e-tron

  • markedly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Outlander

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q8 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Outlander is significantly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Audi Q8 e-tron costs 65,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,209 £.

As for electric range, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers significantly more range – reaching up to 595 km, about 510 km more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

Outlander

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers markedly more power – delivering 503 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 197 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q8 e-tron is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

Q8 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Outlander is slightly lighter – 2,156 kg compared to 2,585 kg. The difference is around 429 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers moderately more boot space – 569 L compared to 498 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q8 e-tron carries slightly more – 595 kg compared to 529 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q8 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £65,100
Q8 e-tron

Audi Q8 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 503 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 456 - 595 km
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Audi Q8 e-tron

The Audi Q8 e-tron wraps Audi’s usual premium polish into a quiet, composed electric SUV that feels refined and surprisingly effortless to drive. With a spacious, tech-forward cabin and understated road presence, it’s a practical yet stylish choice for buyers who want electric motoring without losing the dignity of a proper luxury SUV.

details

Mitsubishi Outlander

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
Audi Q8 e-tron
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption

Price
65,100 - 102,800 £
Price
42,800 - 54,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 26.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
456 - 595 km
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
89 - 106 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
60 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,585 - 2,725 kg
Curb weight
2,156 - 2,232 kg
Trunk capacity
528 - 569 L
Trunk capacity
498 L
Length
4,915 mm
Length
-
Width
1,937 - 1,994 mm
Width
1,862 mm
Height
1,617 - 1,683 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,567 - 1,637 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
515 - 595 kg
Payload
453 - 529 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
340 - 503 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
200 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
664 - 973 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
250 - 370 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Audi
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.