VS

BMW i4 vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (601 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (49,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW i4 or VW T-Cross?

BMW i4 vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

BMW i4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

i4

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the BMW i4 costs 49,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,977 £.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW i4 offers considerably more power – delivering 601 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 451 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW i4 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.4 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW i4 delivers significantly more torque with 795 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 545 Nm more.

i4

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is considerably lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 803 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW i4 offers marginally more boot space – 470 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 15 L.

Maximum payload is identical – both can carry up to 480 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW i4 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,400
i4

BMW i4

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 286 - 601 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.7 - 16.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 514 - 613 km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and VW T‑Cross duke it out in the small SUV ring: the Arona brings punchy styling and a driver-focused feel, while the T‑Cross leans on roomy practicality and Volkswagen calm. Pick the Arona for a bit more sparkle and sporty character, or the T‑Cross if cargo space, refinement and …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
BMW i4
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW i4

The BMW i4 arrives with the poise of a classic Gran Coupé, marrying BMW's playful handling with a sleek, modern interior that makes switching to electric feel like an upgrade rather than a compromise. For buyers who want a practical daily driver that still enjoys a spirited back-road run, the i4 quietly delivers smiles and a surprising dose of driver engagement.

details
P90439358_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90439356_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90439360_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90439369_highRes_bmw-i4-m50-9-2021
P90422904_highRes_bmw-i4-interieur-6-2

Reviews BMW i4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

BMW i4
Polestar 4
VS
The BMW i4 is the driver's EV — taut handling, rear‑drive poise and a cockpit that still feels satisfyingly analogue — while the Polestar 4 plays the Scandinavian minimalist card, pairing bold coupe‑SUV looks with luxurious simplicity and polished electric range. Choose the i4 if you want …
BMW i4
BYD Seal
VS
The BMW i4 feels like a familiar, impeccably tuned sports saloon — razor-sharp steering, plush interior and that badge-backed refinement for drivers who crave engagement over bargains. The BYD Seal, meanwhile, is the plucky tech-packed challenger: startling range and kit for the money, bold design …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
BMW i4
BMW iX2
VS
The BMW i4 and BMW iX2 are two standout electric vehicles that cater to different preferences within the EV market. While the i4 impresses with its sleek design and sporty performance as a four-door coupe, the iX2 offers a more versatile SUV experience with added space and practicality. Both models …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
The Toyota Yaris Cross sails ahead with brilliant hybrid economy, city-sized agility and Toyota’s trademark reliability, while the VW T‑Cross scores for sensible packaging, a bigger boot and a more grown-up driving feel. If you live in town and worship low fuel bills pick the Yaris Cross; if you …
Hyundai Kona
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive world of subcompact SUVs, the Hyundai Kona and VW T-Cross present a compelling showdown. The Hyundai Kona is celebrated for its bold design and sporty performance, while the VW T-Cross offers a more reserved elegance coupled with practical German engineering. Buyers seeking a …
BMW i4
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,400 - 62,500 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.7 - 16.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
514 - 613 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,285 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
470 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,852 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
445 - 480 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 601 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
400 - 795 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
210 - 442 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
VW
Is the BMW i4 offered with different drivetrains?

The BMW i4 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.