Compare performance (601 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (61,900 £ vs 61,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW i5 Touring or Volvo ES90?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Volvo ES90 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 61,700 £ , while the BMW i5 Touring costs 61,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 180 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BMW i5 Touring is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 15.9 kWh/100km for the Volvo ES90. That’s a difference of about 0.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers a bit more range – reaching up to 700 km, about 98 km more than the BMW i5 Touring.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers a bit more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 601 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW i5 Touring is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Volvo ES90 takes 4 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the BMW i5 Touring is visibly faster – reaching 230 km/h, while the Volvo ES90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers marginally more torque with 870 Nm compared to 820 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW i5 Touring is barely lighter – 2,255 kg compared to 2,410 kg. The difference is around 155 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW i5 Touring offers visibly more boot space – 570 L compared to 424 L. That’s a difference of about 146 L.
For maximum load capacity, the BMW i5 Touring offers slightly more capacity – up to 1,700 L, about 273 L more than the Volvo ES90.
When it comes to payload, the BMW i5 Touring carries moderately more – 560 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.
The BMW i5 Touring comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW i5 Touring marries the everyday usefulness of a roomy estate with the hushed, premium feel of a modern electric BMW. It’s an appealing choice for buyers who want confident, relaxed driving and executive poise without sacrificing weekend practicality — and it even makes loading skis feel slightly glamorous.
detailsThe Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
61,900 - 87,000 £
|
Price
61,700 - 81,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 17.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
522 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
651 - 700 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
81.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,255 - 2,425 kg
|
Curb weight
2,410 - 2,610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
424 L
|
|
Length
5,060 mm
|
Length
5,000 mm
|
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
Width
1,942 mm
|
|
Height
1,505 - 1,515 mm
|
Height
1,546 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,700 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,427 L
|
|
Payload
535 - 560 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
340 - 601 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
193 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
430 - 820 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
250 - 442 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Volvo
|