VS

BMW X1 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (326 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (38,700 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X1 or Skoda Kodiaq?

BMW X1 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

BMW X1

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

X1

BMW X1 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Clash of the Compact SUVs

In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and the Skoda Kodiaq have emerged as strong contenders. Both vehicles are designed to offer the perfect blend of performance, comfort, and innovation. But how do they stack up against each other? Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that distinguish these two models.

Kodiaq

Power and Performance

The BMW X1 comes with a variety of engine options, including diesel, petrol, and hybrid powertrains. It boasts an impressive power range from 136 HP to 326 HP, making it a versatile choice for both city drives and highway commutes. The top speed reaches up to 250 km/h, and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from 5.4 to 9.2 seconds. This model is available in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations.

On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq also provides a compelling array of engine choices, spanning from conventional petrol and diesel engines to plug-in hybrids. The Kodiaq's power ranges from 150 HP to 265 HP with maximum speeds up to 231 km/h. Acceleration figures are competitive, ranging from 6.3 to 9.7 seconds. Similar to the X1, it offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options.

X1

Technical Innovations

When it comes to technical innovations, the BMW X1 shines with a well-rounded offering of modern technology. The dual-clutch automatic transmission promises smooth gear transitions, while the plug-in hybrid variant boasts an electric range of up to 83 km, thanks to a 14.2 kWh battery capacity.

The Skoda Kodiaq aims to impress with its own set of innovations. It offers a larger electric range of up to 123 km, benefiting from a more substantial 19.7 kWh battery. The dual-clutch automatic transmission also features prominently in the Kodiaq lineup, ensuring an effortless driving experience.

Kodiaq

Design and Dimensions

Both SUVs make a bold statement on the road. The BMW X1, with its dimensions of approximately 4500 mm in length and 1845 mm in width, presents a sporty and compact profile. It stands at a height range of 1622 mm to 1642 mm, offering agility and ease of parking in urban settings.

In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is slightly more extensive, with a length of around 4761 mm and a width of 1864 mm. Its height ranges from 1663 mm to 1683 mm, providing a more commanding presence on the road and a spacious interior environment.

X1

Interior and Cargo Space

Both models provide comfortable seating for up to five passengers. The BMW X1 offers a trunk capacity between 490 L and 540 L, making it suitable for daily errands and weekend getaways. Its premium interior materials and advanced technology options cater to a luxurious experience.

Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its expansive trunk capacity of up to 910 L, ideal for families and long-haul travelers needing additional storage space. The interior of the Kodiaq is designed with practicality and comfort in mind, balancing quality materials with user-friendly features.

Kodiaq

Environmental Impact

Considering environmental efficiency, the BMW X1's CO2 emissions range from 17 to 175 g/km, with various engine and hybrid configurations offering flexibility in reducing environmental impact. The Skoda Kodiaq, with CO2 emissions ranging from 9 to 186 g/km, offers competitive efficiency, particularly with its plug-in hybrid variant.

X1

Conclusion

In conclusion, both the BMW X1 and Skoda Kodiaq offer compelling packages, each with distinct strengths. The BMW X1 is ideal for those seeking performance versatility and cutting-edge tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq appeals to those needing more space and an extended electric range. Ultimately, the choice between these two rivals depends on personal preferences and specific needs, whether it's performance, space, or environmental considerations.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X1

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kodiaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 780 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the BMW X1 with 2.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 41 km more than the BMW X1.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers somewhat more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers a bit more torque with 477 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 77 Nm more.

X1

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BMW X1 is very slightly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 370 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries slightly more – 563 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
BMW X1
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW X1

The BMW X1 delivers BMW's sporty driving character in a compact premium crossover package, making daily driving both engaging and practical. With a refined cabin, flexible cargo space and composed handling, it's a smart choice for buyers who want luxury and versatility without compromise.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
BMW X1
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
38,700 - 56,200 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
81 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
57 - 175 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
490 - 500 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
BMW
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.