VS

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (398 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (51,700 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X3 or Mazda CX-80?

BMW X3 vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

BMW X3

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

X3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the BMW X3 costs 51,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,357 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X3 uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the BMW X3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 88 km, about 28 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the BMW X3 offers somewhat more power – delivering 398 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X3 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X3 delivers moderately more torque with 670 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 120 Nm more.

X3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, BMW X3 is a bit lighter – 1,930 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 201 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW X3 offers significantly more boot space – 570 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 312 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BMW X3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,700
X3

BMW X3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 197 - 398 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 88 km
BMW X3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BMW X3

The BMW X3 mixes Bavarian poise with everyday practicality, delivering a composed ride and a cabin that feels both premium and lived-in. It’s the sort of SUV that lets you enjoy sporty handling without sacrificing family-friendly space, so you get fun and sense in one neat package.

details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
BMW X3
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption

Price
51,700 - 73,000 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
88 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 175 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,930 - 2,140 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
460 - 570 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,920 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
570 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
197 - 398 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
330 - 670 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
145 - 293 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,995 - 2,998 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
BMW
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.