In the competitive segment of luxury compact SUVs, the BMW X3 and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinct approaches to performance and comfort. The X3 excels with its sporty handling and powerful engine options, offering an engaging driving experience that enthusiasts crave. Meanwhile, the XC60 impresses with its Scandinavian design and an emphasis on safety, making it a top choice for those prioritizing a serene and secure driving environment.
The premium SUV segment is a fiercely competitive arena, with numerous brands vying for the attention of discerning buyers. Among the top contenders, the BMW X3 and Volvo XC60 stand out not only for their aesthetics but also for their technical prowess and innovative features. This comparison will explore how these two models stack up against each other in various aspects, catering to those seeking a blend of performance, luxury, and safety.
The BMW X3 offers a diverse range of powertrains, including diesel MHEVs, petrol MHEVs, plug-in hybrids, and petrol engines. With power outputs ranging from 184 to a hefty 510 HP, the X3 accommodates a broad spectrum of driving preferences. The acceleration performance is impressive, particularly with its top variant achieving 0-100 km/h in a mere 3.8 seconds.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 focuses primarily on petrol MHEVs and plug-in hybrids, reaching a maximum output of 455 HP. While its acceleration figures are notable, particularly the 4.9 seconds from 0-100 km/h for the most powerful variant, its top speed of 180 km/h lags behind the X3. Nevertheless, the XC60's electric range stands out, with a capability of up to 80 km on electric power alone.
Fuel efficiency has become a significant criterion for buyers. The BMW X3 showcases commendable figures, with models achieving consumption as low as 2.1 L/100 km for its plug-in hybrid variants. Even the traditional petrol engines are designed for efficiency, making it a strong contender in this category.
Conversely, the Volvo XC60 shares a similar commitment to efficiency, with its best models matching the low consumption metrics of the X3. Its plug-in hybrids are also lauded for low CO2 emissions, achieving as little as 22 g/km, underlining Volvo's commitment to sustainability without sacrificing power.
Both SUVs offer spacious interiors designed for passenger comfort and cargo versatility. The BMW X3 boasts a trunk capacity ranging from 450 to 570 liters, accommodating both luggage and everyday items with ease. The high-quality materials and attention to detail in the interior make it inviting for passengers.
In contrast, the Volvo XC60, though slightly less spacious with trunk capacities of 468 to 483 liters, provides an equally luxurious cabin rich in Scandinavian design aesthetics. Volvo’s focus on safety and comfort is evident, ensuring that all occupants enjoy a premium experience throughout their journey.
When it comes to technology, both brands have made remarkable strides. The BMW X3 incorporates the latest iDrive system with a user-friendly interface, offering features such as navigation, connectivity options, and advanced driver assistance systems. The highly customizable digital display allows drivers to seamlessly adapt the vehicle's settings to their preferences.
The Volvo XC60 takes a slightly different approach, focusing on safety innovations with its renowned Pilot Assist feature, which aids drivers during highway driving by automatically adjusting speed and positioning within the lane. The Sensus infotainment system enhances user experience through a clean, intuitive interface, ensuring that infotainment options are well-integrated without overwhelming the driver.
Choosing between the BMW X3 and the Volvo XC60 ultimately depends on individual priorities. For those prioritizing performance and a broader range of engine options, the X3 might be more appealing. Meanwhile, buyers seeking unparalleled safety innovations combined with a luxurious, minimalist design might lean towards the XC60.
Both vehicles represent the pinnacle of what the premium SUV segment has to offer, blending style, technology, and performance into attractive packages. The decision now rests in the hands of the consumer—what will you prioritize in your next SUV?
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 47900 - 90300
£
|
Price
about 48800 - 74600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 10.8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.9 - 7.7
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
44 - 90
km
|
Electric Range
79 - 80
km
|
Battery Capacity
11.2 - 19.7
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.7
kWh
|
co2
21 - 246
g/km
|
co2
22 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 68
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1875 - 2140
kg
|
Curb weight
1900 - 2150
kg
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 570
L
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483
L
|
Length
4708 - 4755
mm
|
Length
4688
mm
|
Width
1891 - 1920
mm
|
Width
1902
mm
|
Height
1660 - 1676
mm
|
Height
1658
mm
|
Payload
415 - 585
kg
|
Payload
510 - 550
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Automatikgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
184 - 510
HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 8.4
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9
s
|
Max Speed
210 - 250
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
300 - 700
Nm
|
Torque
350 - 709
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
135 - 375
kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335
kW
|
Engine capacity
1995 - 2998
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969
cm3
|
Top speed
210 - 250
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B, G, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.