VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Ford Mustang Mach-E?

BYD Atto 3 vs Ford Mustang Mach-E: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter

Ford Mustang Mach-E

3.4 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • somewhat more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

BYD Atto 3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Mustang Mach-E costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,008 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the BYD Atto 3 is slightly more efficient: consuming 16 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Ford Mustang Mach-E. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 600 km, about 90 km more than the BYD Atto 3.

Mustang Mach-E

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers only slightly more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 449 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the BYD Atto 3 takes 3.9 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Mach-E delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 390 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is somewhat lighter – 1,825 kg compared to 2,161 kg. The difference is around 336 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Mustang Mach-E offers slightly more boot space – 519 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 79 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Mustang Mach-E carries visibly more – 450 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Mustang Mach-E stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Mustang Mach-E

Ford Mustang Mach-E

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 268 - 487 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 470 - 600 km
BYD Atto 3
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.

details

Ford Mustang Mach-E

The Mustang Mach-E proves an electric SUV can be both playful and practical, with the Mustang name bringing muscle-car charisma to a family-friendly package. It delivers eager performance, a comfortable cabin, and a slick infotainment setup that keeps daily driving fun — and yes, you’ll still get admiring glances at the lights.

details
BYD Atto 3
Ford Mustang Mach-E

Costs and Consumption

Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
Price
48,400 - 66,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 21 kWh/100km
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
Electric Range
470 - 600 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,825 kg
Curb weight
2,161 - 2,351 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
4,455 mm
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,881 mm
Height
1,615 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
335 kg
Payload
368 - 450 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
Power HP
268 - 487 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 6.2 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
Torque
525 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
Power kW
197 - 358 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.