Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Atto 3 vs Mercedes EQA comparison
Compare performance (449 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 44,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Mercedes EQA?
BYD Atto 3 vs Mercedes EQA: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Atto 3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Atto 3 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 44,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,817 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQA is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.4 kWh/100km compared to 16 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 561 km, about 51 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
EQA
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 6 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 160 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers marginally more torque with 560 Nm compared to 520 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
Atto 3
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is slightly lighter – 1,825 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 220 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers visibly more boot space – 440 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 100 L.
For maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 3 offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,338 L, about 18 L more than the Mercedes EQA.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQA carries clearly more – 425 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The BYD Atto 3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £33,400
BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 3
Mercedes EQA
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BYD Atto 3
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Mercedes EQA
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
BYD Atto 3
Mercedes EQA
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
|
Price
44,200 - 57,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,115 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
|
Length
4,455 mm
|
Length
4,463 mm
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
|
Height
1,615 mm
|
Height
1,608 - 1,613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,320 L
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.