VS

BYD Atto 3 vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Volvo XC40?

BYD Atto 3 vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h

Volvo XC40

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly lighter
  • barely more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

BYD Atto 3 is marginally cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,342 £.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers substantially more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 252 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Volvo XC40 is a bit faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers considerably more torque with 560 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is very slightly lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 1,825 kg. The difference is around 137 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers barely more boot space – 452 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.

For maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 3 offers only slightly more capacity – up to 1,338 L, about 10 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries clearly more – 532 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 197 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 204 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 420 - 510 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
In the battle of BYD's innovative electric vehicles, the Atto 3 emerges as a more advanced contender compared to the Atto 2. With its sleek design, improved range, and enhanced technology features, the Atto 3 not only offers better performance but also caters to the growing demand for eco-friendly …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
BYD Atto 3
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
S. M.
20 Apr 2026, 09:07:56

Excellent

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
If you want a friendly, practical EV that looks like it drinks coffee in a hipster cafe and carries everything from groceries to weekend bikes, the BYD Atto 3 is the sensible, value-packed choice. The BYD Seal U, by contrast, dresses up the electric experience with sleeker lines, sharper handling …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the extrovert of the pair—bold styling, a quirky, techy interior and strong value that make it a fun crossover to live with, while the Volvo XC40 plays the long game with understated Scandinavian style, class-leading safety and a more premium feel. Pick the 3008 if you want …
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
The CUPRA Formentor is a punchy, coupe-styled compact SUV whose sharp chassis and spicy engines deliver grin-inducing drive and looks that demand attention; the Volvo XC40 answers with calm Scandinavian poise, clever practicality and safety tech that makes daily life feel worry-free. If you crave …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Meet BYD's feisty duo: the Atto 3 — a cheeky, city-friendly compact crossover — takes on the Sealion 7, a sleeker, more spacious contender that aims to blend family practicality with a touch of flair. Which one wins your garage comes down to whether you crave nimble urban fun or roomy long-range …
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
BYD Atto 3
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
440 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4,455 mm
Length
4,425 mm
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
1,615 mm
Height
1,652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
Payload
335 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
BYD
Brand
Volvo
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.