Compare performance (204 HP vs 449 HP), boot space and price (29,700 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Dolphin or BYD Atto 3?
In an era where electric vehicles (EVs) are becoming a staple on the roads, BYD is increasingly recognized for its innovative offerings. Among its latest models are the BYD Atto 3 and the BYD Dolphin, both of which embody the brand's commitment to electric mobility. While they serve distinct market niches, a close comparison reveals their technical prowess and innovations.
The BYD Atto 3 is classified as an SUV, featuring a robust and bold body type that appeals to families and adventure-seekers. With dimensions measuring 4455 mm in length, 1875 mm in width, and 1615 mm in height, it offers a commanding road presence. In contrast, the BYD Dolphin adopts a hatchback design, making it a more compact and agile option for urban driving. The Dolphin's dimensions are slightly smaller, with a length of 4290 mm, width of 1770 mm, and height of 1570 mm, providing it a blend of efficiency and practicality in crowded environments.
Both models share the same powertrain specifications which include a 204 HP electric motor, delivering a torque of 310 Nm. They are equipped with a front-wheel-drive system and utilize an automatic transmission with a reduction gearbox. This setup ensures smooth acceleration and efficient power delivery. The BYD Atto 3 has a noteworthy acceleration time of 7.3 seconds to reach 100 km/h, while the Dolphin is slightly quicker, achieving the same in just 7 seconds. This showcases the Dolphin's agile performance, especially suited for city roads.
When it comes to energy efficiency, the BYD Dolphin leads slightly ahead with a consumption rate of 15.9 kWh/100 km, compared to the Atto 3’s consumption of 16 kWh/100 km. Despite this marginal difference, both models provide impressive electric ranges; the Atto 3 boasts a range of up to 420 km, while the Dolphin is close behind with 427 km. This makes both vehicles suitable for daily commutes as well as longer journeys without the anxiety of frequent recharging.
Interior space is always a consideration for potential buyers. The BYD Atto 3 offers a generous trunk capacity of 440 liters, making it ideal for families or those needing to transport larger cargo. Meanwhile, the Dolphin provides a smaller trunk space of 345 liters, fitting its hatchback style. However, both vehicles can comfortably seat five passengers, ensuring adequate space for both driver and passengers on any journey.
BYD has embedded advanced technology into both models, prioritizing safety and user experience. Both vehicles come with a range of driver-assistance features, including advanced braking systems and stability control. The Atto 3, with its SUV stature, also provides an elevated seating position, enhancing the driver's visibility. Meanwhile, the Dolphin, with its compact size, offers nimble handling, making it a joy to navigate busy streets.
In summary, the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Dolphin are remarkable representatives of BYD's commitment to the electric vehicle era. The Atto 3 stands out for those who favor a spacious SUV, while the Dolphin appeals to urban drivers seeking agility and efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences regarding space, body type, and driving dynamics. Regardless of the model chosen, both offer a glimpse into the future of sustainable transportation.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
BYD Dolphin is somewhat cheaper – starting at 29,700 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,729 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the BYD Dolphin is barely more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 16 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 83 km more than the BYD Dolphin.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers significantly more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 245 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the BYD Dolphin takes 7 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 160 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers clearly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Dolphin is somewhat lighter – 1,658 kg compared to 1,825 kg. The difference is around 167 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers markedly more boot space – 440 L compared to 345 L. That’s a difference of about 95 L.
For maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 3 offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,338 L, about 28 L more than the BYD Dolphin.
When it comes to payload, the BYD Dolphin carries slightly more – 410 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
The BYD Atto 3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Dolphin is a cheeky electric hatchback that blends playful styling with surprising practicality, making it a brilliant city companion for buyers who want modern tech without the showroom bravado. It’s comfy, efficient and easy to live with, and while it won’t blind you with supercar drama, it will quietly get the job done with plenty of character.
details
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,700 - 31,400 £
|
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
427 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,658 kg
|
Curb weight
1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
345 L
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
|
Length
4,290 mm
|
Length
4,455 mm
|
|
Width
1,770 mm
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
|
Height
1,570 mm
|
Height
1,615 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,310 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
|
|
Payload
410 kg
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
BYD
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España