Compare performance (517 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (64,300 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Tang or Ford Explorer EV?
As electric vehicles (EVs) sweep the automotive industry, the competition is fierce among manufacturers vying to capture the hearts of eco-conscious drivers. The BYD Tang and Ford Explorer EV are two standout entries in the SUV segment. This article offers an in-depth comparison of these two models, analyzing their technical specifications and innovative features to help potential buyers make informed decisions.
The BYD Tang boasts impressive performance figures, delivering a robust 517 horsepower and a torque of 680 Nm. This allows the Tang to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in a mere 4.9 seconds, making it a strong performer in the electric SUV market. Its all-wheel-drive system ensures optimal traction and handling, ideal for both urban streets and more rugged terrains.
In contrast, the Ford Explorer EV offers multiple powertrain options. The strongest variant delivers up to 340 horsepower with a torque of 679 Nm. While it takes about 5.3 seconds to reach 100 km/h, this is commendable for a vehicle weighing around 2,167 kg. The Explorer EV also has the flexibility of both rear-wheel and all-wheel drive, accommodating diverse driving needs.
One of the biggest considerations for electric vehicle buyers is range. The BYD Tang offers an impressive electric range of 530 km on a full charge, with an energy consumption of 24 kWh per 100 km. In terms of overall efficiency, the Tang stands out but is still somewhat overshadowed by the Explorer EV’s several configurations, which offer ranges up to 602 km, depending on the battery capacity chosen (77 kWh and 79 kWh options available). The Explorer EV consumes between 13.9 to 16.6 kWh/100 km, inching ahead in terms of spacing between efficiency and range.
Families will appreciate the spacious interiors of both SUVs, but they offer different seating capacities. The BYD Tang accommodates seven passengers, ideal for larger families or those needing extra space. In terms of trunk capacity, it offers 235 liters, providing decent space for luggage and groceries.
The Ford Explorer EV, while seating five, provides a more generous trunk capacity of up to 450 liters depending on the variant. Although it accommodates fewer passengers, it offers flexibility for storage and luggage, which is essential for daily usage and weekend getaways.
When comparing body dimensions, the BYD Tang measures at 4,970 mm in length, 1,955 mm in width, and 1,745 mm in height. This size contributes to its spacious interior and robust stance on the road.
The Ford Explorer EV, however, is more compact, measuring 4,468 mm in length, 1,871 mm in width, and 1,630 mm in height. This means it may be easier to maneuver in urban settings while still providing a comfortable ride, though it sacrifices a bit of interior space in the process.
Both vehicles come equipped with advanced technological features aimed at enhancing the driving experience. The BYD Tang integrates a user-friendly infotainment system, often paired with an array of safety features including blind-spot monitoring, lane-keeping assist, and advanced adaptive cruise control. These innovations position it as a highly connected vehicle suitable for modern lifestyles.
The Ford Explorer EV is a solid contender as well, boasting Ford's latest SYNC infotainment system, which offers seamless smartphone integration and a suite of safety technologies. In terms of innovation, Ford emphasizes connectivity, with features that cater to users who rely heavily on their devices. The Explorer EV also includes Ford Co-Pilot 360, further enhancing the safety net for its occupants.
The BYD Tang and Ford Explorer EV both present compelling offerings in the electric SUV market. The Tang excels in performance and spaciousness, catering specifically to families seeking a high-performance electric model. On the other hand, the Ford Explorer EV shines with its efficiency, range options, and advanced technology, making it more suitable for drivers prioritizing connectivity and versatility.
Ultimately, the choice between the BYD Tang and Ford Explorer EV will come down to personal preference, driving needs, and lifestyle demands. Whether you prioritize exhilarating performance or cutting-edge technology, both vehicles promise to deliver an excellent driving experience.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Explorer EV is considerably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the BYD Tang costs 64,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,085 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is substantially more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 24 kWh/100km for the BYD Tang. That’s a difference of about 9.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers a bit more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 72 km more than the BYD Tang.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang offers markedly more power – delivering 517 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 177 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Explorer EV takes 5.3 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Tang delivers very slightly more torque with 680 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 1 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: BYD Tang offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is noticeably lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,630 kg. The difference is around 634 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Explorer EV offers significantly more boot space – 472 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 237 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries only slightly more – 585 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 10 kg.
The Ford Explorer EV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Tang is a bold, tech-loaded SUV that blends striking design with roomy practicality, making it equally at home on the school run and the open road. Packed with clever tech and a powertrain that mixes efficiency with eager performance, it’s a smart, value-focused pick for buyers who want electric-age comfort without the premium-brand fuss.
details
The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
64,300 £
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
530 km
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,630 kg
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
235 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,955 mm
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
575 kg
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
517 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
680 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
380 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España