Is the BYD Tang offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Tang is available as All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the BYD Tang deliver on the road?

Up to 517 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the BYD Tang’s energy consumption?

In the WLTP cycle, the BYD Tang consumes around 24 kWh.

What is the electric driving range of the BYD Tang?

According to WLTP, the BYD Tang can travel up to 530 km on a single charge.

What are the dimensions of the BYD Tang?

Length 4970 mm, width 1955 mm, height 1745 mm – those are the dimensions of the BYD Tang.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 1.60 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 61 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-80 go?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches up to 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-80 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 is 4995 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1714 mm high.

BYD Tang vs Mazda CX-80 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tang @ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the BYD Tang costs 64300 £. That’s a price difference of around 16071 £.

As for range, the BYD Tang performs significantly better – achieving up to 530 km, about 469 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Tang has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 517 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Tang is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs a bit better – reaching 219 km/h, while the BYD Tang tops out at 190 km/h. The difference is around 29 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Tang pulls to a small extent stronger with 680 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.

Tang @ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is noticeable lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2630 kg. The difference is around 499 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers minimal more room – 258 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs to a small extent better – up to 1971 L, which is about 316 L more than the BYD Tang.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 to a small extent takes the win – 650 kg compared to 575 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the BYD Tang shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews BYD Tang

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota Highlander

VS

In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …

Costs and Consumption
Price 64300 £	Price 48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km 24 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 530 km	Electric Range 61 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 g/km	co2 35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 7	Seats 7
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2630 kg	Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity 235 L	Trunk capacity 258 L
Length 4970 mm	Length 4995 mm
Width 1955 mm	Width 1890 mm
Height 1745 mm	Height 1714 mm
Max trunk capacity 1655 L	Max trunk capacity 1971 L
Payload 575 kg	Payload 649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 517 HP	Power HP 254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.90 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed 190 km/h	Max Speed 195 - 219 km/h
Torque 680 Nm	Torque 500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders 4 - 6
Power kW 380 kW	Power kW 187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3