Compare performance (8 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (6,800 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Ami or Ford Transit Connect?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Citroen Ami is substantially cheaper – starting at 6,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,956 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Connect offers substantially more power – delivering 122 HP compared to 8 HP. That’s roughly 114 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers significantly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 40 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 2 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen Ami is clearly lighter – 470 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 1,105 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries clearly more – 780 kg compared to 230 kg. That’s a difference of about 550 kg.
The Citroen Ami is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën Ami is a cheeky, ultra-compact city runabout that turns parking into a non-event and makes traffic feel almost friendly. It won't thrill you with speed or luxury, but as an economical, fuss-free way to nip around town and save on congestion, it's a clever little solution for urban life—with personality to spare.
details
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
6,800 - 8,200 £
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
470 - 483 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
63 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,390 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
217 - 230 kg
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
8 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
40 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
6 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Ford
|