VS

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Nissan Qashqai comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (22,100 £ vs 29,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Berlingo Transporter or Nissan Qashqai?

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Nissan Qashqai: Key differences

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

  • markedly cheaper
  • barely lighter
  • considerably more trunk space

Nissan Qashqai

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • slightly more efficient

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Berlingo Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen Berlingo Transporter is markedly cheaper – starting at 22,100 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,471 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.5 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Citroen Berlingo Transporter with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Qashqai

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers clearly more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Nissan Qashqai is moderately faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the Citroen Berlingo Transporter tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 23 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers barely more torque with 330 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen Berlingo Transporter is barely lighter – 1,329 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 91 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter offers considerably more boot space – 1,800 L compared to 504 L. That’s a difference of about 1,296 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter offers considerably more capacity – up to 4,000 L, about 2,553 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter carries substantially more – 991 kg compared to 520 kg. That’s a difference of about 471 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen Berlingo Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,100
Berlingo Transporter

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 354 km
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

The Citroën Berlingo is a no-nonsense work van that pairs cavernous practicality with a surprisingly comfy, car-like driving experience. It won’t pretend to be sporty, but it will swallow your cargo, simplify your day, and keep ownership headaches to a minimum with sensible packaging and clever storage.

details

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Nissan Qashqai

Costs and Consumption

Price
22,100 - 33,800 £
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
354 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
46 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 143 g/km
co2
102 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
53 - 61 L
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,329 - 1,813 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,665 kg
Trunk capacity
1,800 L
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Length
4,401 - 4,751 mm
Length
4,425 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,835 mm
Height
1,796 - 1,812 mm
Height
1,625 mm
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,000 L
Max trunk capacity
1,422 - 1,447 L
Payload
611 - 991 kg
Payload
466 - 520 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.