VS

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Skoda Kamiq comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (22,100 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen Berlingo Transporter or Skoda Kamiq?

Citroen Berlingo Transporter vs Skoda Kamiq: Key differences

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

  • very slightly cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • substantially more trunk space

Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • very slightly lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Berlingo Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Citroen Berlingo Transporter is very slightly cheaper – starting at 22,100 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 134 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen Berlingo Transporter uses 5.2 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Kamiq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers only slightly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kamiq is somewhat faster – reaching 216 km/h, while the Citroen Berlingo Transporter tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 33 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen Berlingo Transporter delivers moderately more torque with 300 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is very slightly lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,329 kg. The difference is around 98 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter offers substantially more boot space – 1,800 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 1,400 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter offers significantly more capacity – up to 4,000 L, about 2,605 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen Berlingo Transporter carries clearly more – 991 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 452 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen Berlingo Transporter stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,100
Berlingo Transporter

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 354 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Citroen Berlingo Transporter

The Citroën Berlingo is a no-nonsense work van that pairs cavernous practicality with a surprisingly comfy, car-like driving experience. It won’t pretend to be sporty, but it will swallow your cargo, simplify your day, and keep ownership headaches to a minimum with sensible packaging and clever storage.

details
serpimg_U76QhZ

Reviews Citroen Berlingo Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kamiq

The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.

details
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114819
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ dynamisch_114822
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ _114865
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ – Kofferraum_114870
Der neue SKODA KAMIQ Interieur_114688

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (5 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Between the sporty, streetwise SEAT Arona and the sensible Škoda Kamiq, the Arona wins hearts with sharper styling and a livelier chassis that makes every corner a little more fun. The Kamiq, however, is the adult in the room — smarter storage, a bigger boot and a calmer cabin, the pragmatic choice …
Skoda Kamiq
VW Taigo
VS
In the compact crossover ring the Skoda Kamiq plays the sensible everyman—generous boot, clever storage and frugal engines—while the VW Taigo strikes a pose with coupe‑like styling and a slightly livelier, more characterful drive. If you need practical space and everyday value, pick the Kamiq; if …
Skoda Kamiq
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Skoda Kamiq and Toyota Yaris Cross both offer compelling options for urban drivers. The Kamiq impresses with its spacious interior and practicality, while the Yaris Cross stands out for its hybrid efficiency and dynamic handling. Ultimately, the choice …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Kia Niro
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Niro and Skoda Kamiq stand out with their distinct advantages. The Kia Niro impresses with its hybrid and all-electric options, delivering excellent fuel efficiency and eco-friendly performance, making it an ideal choice for environmentally …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Kia Stonic stands out with its bold design and vibrant color options, appealing to younger, style-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq impresses with its spacious interior and practical features, making it a strong choice for families looking …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq offer distinct yet appealing options for buyers. The Ateca impresses with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it a favorite among those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Kamiq stands out for its …
Citroen Berlingo Transporter
Skoda Kamiq

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,100 - 33,800 £
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
354 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
46 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 143 g/km
co2
121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
53 - 61 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,329 - 1,813 kg
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
Trunk capacity
1,800 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
4,401 - 4,751 mm
Length
4,241 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
1,796 - 1,812 mm
Height
1,562 mm
Max trunk capacity
3,300 - 4,000 L
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
Payload
611 - 991 kg
Payload
439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Citroen
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Citroen Berlingo Transporter?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.