Compare performance (113 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (13,700 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Citroen C3 or Nissan Juke?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the vibrant arena of urban SUVs, the Citroen C3 and Nissan Juke stand out as two dynamic contenders. Both vehicles boast a striking presence, yet they cater to differing tastes and demands of modern drivers. In this detailed comparison, we explore the technical nuances and innovations that make each model unique.
The Citroen C3 sports a distinctive design that radiates elegance and modernity. Measuring 4015 mm in length, 1755 mm in width, and 1567 mm in height, it embodies compactness, making it nimble for city driving. In contrast, the Nissan Juke is slightly more imposing with a length of 4210 mm, width of 1800 mm, and height of 1593 mm, offering a bold statement on the roads.
The Citroen C3 offers a choice between petrol, electric, and mild hybrid engines. It provides power ranging from 101 to 113 HP with torque up to 205 Nm, ensuring a spirited performance. The electric variant promises a commendable range of up to 326 km, catering to eco-conscious drivers.
On the other hand, the Nissan Juke is available in both petrol and full hybrid options. Its engines churn out between 114 and 143 HP with a torque of 200 Nm, striking a balance between power and efficiency. The Juke’s hybrid version provides an economical consumption rate of just 4.7 L/100km, perfect for city commuting.
For those who enjoy manual driving, the Citroen C3 offers both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, providing flexibility based on driver preference. The front-wheel-drive system ensures ease and control, crucial for navigating urban landscapes.
The Nissan Juke, with its manual and automatic gearbox options, also favors a front-wheel-drive system, enhancing its agility and responsiveness, particularly in city conditions.
Both the C3 and Juke offer seating for five, prioritizing comfort and space. The Citroen C3's trunk, with a capacity of 310 L, might seem compact, but it efficiently utilizes space to its advantage. In contrast, the Juke impresses with a larger trunk capacity of up to 422 L, providing ample space for luggage and shopping trips.
In terms of environmental consciousness, the C3’s electric variant boasts zero emissions, earning an A CO2 efficiency class rating, a testament to Citroen's commitment to sustainability. The petrol models maintain reasonable emissions with CO2 outputs of 123-126 g/km.
The Juke’s hybrid model, with its lower CO2 emissions of 107 g/km, showcases Nissan's efforts in enhancing fuel efficiency while minimizing environmental impact. However, its non-hybrid variants fall into slightly lower efficiency classes.
The choice between Citroen C3 and Nissan Juke ultimately boils down to personal priorities. The C3 is an excellent choice for those seeking versatility and advanced eco-friendly options, while the Juke caters to those who desire bolder styling and slightly more space. Whichever you lean towards, both models promise an engaging driving experience tailored for today’s urban demands.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Citroen C3 is clearly cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Nissan Juke costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,680 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Juke offers visibly more power – delivering 143 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C3 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 9.9 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C3 delivers only slightly more torque with 205 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is only slightly lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 48 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers noticeably more boot space – 422 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Juke carries barely more – 427 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
The Citroen C3 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Citroën C3 is a stylish and practical small hatchback that puts comfort and a calm urban driving experience at the top of its list. With its distinctive looks and thoughtful interior touches, it suits buyers who want personality and everyday usability without drama.
details
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 126 g/km
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,755 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
227 - 423 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España