What drive types are available for the CUPRA Ateca?

The CUPRA Ateca is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the CUPRA Ateca deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the CUPRA Ateca delivers up to 300 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the CUPRA Ateca according to the manufacturer?

On average, the CUPRA Ateca consumes 6.70 L.

What is the top speed of the CUPRA Ateca?

Depending on the model, top speed is 250 km/h.

What is the CUPRA Ateca’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 510 L fit inside.

How big is the CUPRA Ateca overall?

Overall, the CUPRA Ateca is 4394 mm long, 1841 mm wide and 1601 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Honda CR-V have?

The Honda CR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Honda CR-V deliver on the road?

Up to 184 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Honda CR-V use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 0.90 L.

What is the top speed of the Honda CR-V?

The Honda CR-V reaches up to 195 km/h.

How big is the Honda CR-V overall?

Length 4706 mm, width 1866 mm, height 1673 mm – those are the dimensions of the Honda CR-V.

CUPRA Ateca vs Honda CR-V - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ateca @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

CUPRA Ateca has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37300 £, while the Honda CR-V costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 5503 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Honda CR-V manages with 0.90 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the CUPRA Ateca with 6.70 L. The difference is about 5.80 L per 100 km.

CR-V @ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Ateca has a distinct edge – offering 300 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 116 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Ateca is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 4.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the CUPRA Ateca performs noticeable better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Honda CR-V tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 55 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: CUPRA Ateca pulls slightly stronger with 400 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.

Ateca @ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, CUPRA Ateca is clearly perceptible lighter – 1418 kg compared to 1821 kg. The difference is around 403 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Honda CR-V offers to a small extent more room – 617 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 107 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Honda CR-V performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1710 L, which is about 106 L more than the CUPRA Ateca.

When it comes to payload, CUPRA Ateca slight takes the win – 522 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Honda CR-V proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Honda CR-V is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews CUPRA Ateca

Reviews Honda CR-V

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Honda CR-V

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat …

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga

@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.

Honda CR-V

VS

In the competitive compact SUV market, the Ford Kuga stands out with its sporty design and agile handling, offering a dynamic driving experience that appeals to enthusiasts. In contrast, the Honda CR-V impresses with its reputation for reliability and spacious interior, making it a family-friendly …

Costs and Consumption
Price 37300 - 48600 £	Price 42800 - 52100 £
Consumption L/100km 6.7 - 9.1 L	Consumption L/100km 0.9 - 6.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 79 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 152 - 207 g/km	co2 19 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 50 - 55 L	Fuel tank capacity 46 - 57 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1418 - 1628 kg	Curb weight 1821 - 1988 kg
Trunk capacity 485 - 510 L	Trunk capacity 579 - 617 L
Length 4394 mm	Length 4706 mm
Width 1841 mm	Width 1866 mm
Height 1601 mm	Height 1673 - 1684 mm
Max trunk capacity 1579 - 1604 L	Max trunk capacity 1634 - 1710 L
Payload 502 - 522 kg	Payload 439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail CVT
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 300 HP	Power HP 184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.9 - 9.3 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed 199 - 250 km/h	Max Speed 187 - 195 km/h
Torque 250 - 400 Nm	Torque 335 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 110 - 221 kW	Power kW 135 kW
Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3	Engine capacity 1993 cm3