VS

CUPRA Ateca vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (300 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (37,300 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Ateca or Mazda CX-80?

CUPRA Ateca vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

CUPRA Ateca

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
  • considerably more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • significantly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ateca

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

CUPRA Ateca is markedly cheaper – starting at 37,300 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,060 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the CUPRA Ateca with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers very slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 300 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Ateca is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Ateca

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Ateca is clearly lighter – 1,418 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 713 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Ateca offers considerably more boot space – 485 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 227 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 522 kg. That’s a difference of about 128 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
CUPRA Ateca
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Ateca

The CUPRA Ateca mixes SUV practicality with a seriously sporty attitude, wrapped in aggressive styling and a cockpit that looks like it belongs on a racetrack. It's the kind of car that handles daily life with composure while slipping a grin across your face every time you push it—perfect for drivers who want a practical companion that never apologizes for having fun.

details
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_20_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_27_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_40_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_49_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_54_HQ
New-CUPRA-Ateca-2020_61_HQ

Reviews CUPRA Ateca

4.1 (2 Reviews)
rate
Stephan B.
18 Feb 2026, 05:44:55

The Cupra Ateca is technically state-of-the-art. The interior tech is top-notch, the materials feel premium and are genuinely useful. But it’s still a car — a practical tool — and despite the excellent build quality and very solid engine performance, it remains affordable for the average buyer.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
CUPRA Ateca
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Ateca turns the sensible family SUV into a pocket rocket with sharper suspension, a punchier engine and aggressive styling that makes commuting feel like a weekend trackday. If you prefer lower running costs, more comfort and smarter value, the SEAT Ateca is the clear choice — practical, …
CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Ateca
VS
CUPRA Formentor and CUPRA Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the CUPRA Formentor or the …
CUPRA Ateca
CUPRA Terramar
VS
In the battle of performance SUVs, the CUPRA Ateca and CUPRA Terramar showcase distinct personalities. The Ateca delivers a sporty drive with a powerful engine and agile handling, while the Terramar offers a more refined experience with added versatility and advanced technology. Both models reflect …
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
CUPRA Ateca
SEAT Arona
VS
CUPRA Ateca and SEAT Arona go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the CUPRA Ateca or the SEAT …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique offerings. The Santa Fe impresses with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the CX-80 captivates with its elegant design and sporty …
CUPRA Ateca
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,300 - 51,200 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 9.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
153 - 207 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,418 - 1,628 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
485 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,841 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
502 - 522 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 300 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
110 - 221 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Ateca?

The CUPRA Ateca is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.