VS

CUPRA Tavascan vs Rolls-Royce Phantom comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 571 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 445,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Tavascan or Rolls-Royce Phantom?

CUPRA Tavascan vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: Key differences

CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Phantom

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tavascan

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

CUPRA Tavascan is significantly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Phantom costs 445,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 402,943 £.

Phantom

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers considerably more power – delivering 571 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 231 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the CUPRA Tavascan takes 5.5 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Phantom delivers noticeably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 545 Nm. That’s about 355 Nm more.

Tavascan

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, CUPRA Tavascan is noticeably lighter – 2,096 kg compared to 2,560 kg. The difference is around 464 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers barely more boot space – 548 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Tavascan carries slightly more – 518 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The CUPRA Tavascan holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
Tavascan

CUPRA Tavascan

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 557 km
details

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Raval
VS
Choosing between the CUPRA Tavascan and the CUPRA Raval means weighing two different takes on style, technology and driving character from the same performance-focused brand. This comparison will cover driving dynamics, range and charging, interior practicality, and overall value so you can pick …
CUPRA Tavascan
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Tavascan

The Cupra Tavascan blends athletic styling with a premium, driver-focused cabin, giving the electric crossover a distinctly sporty character. It feels poised and engaging on the road while standing out with bold design cues and a modern, high-quality finish.

details
89C3E534-A830-42FA-86CC-BA89F47CCA5A
E1499BC5-9624-4D31-A93B-93D1887B3824
2C084747-FC5E-41F7-84AE-11FE7F54C046

Reviews CUPRA Tavascan

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
David
25 Apr 2026, 10:57:49

Both are very good. The range and energy consumption is beter in the cupra. The cupra is also more responsive and it handles beter. The Kia is more spacious and slightly beter tech wise. The Kia is more a family car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Rolls-Royce Phantom

The Phantom stands as the epitome of luxury and craftsmanship, effortlessly merging opulence with unparalleled performance. With its iconic design and attention to detail, this flagship sedan commands respect on the road while cocooning its passengers in sumptuous comfort. Every journey in the Phantom is an experience, where timeless elegance meets cutting-edge technology.

details
serpimg_Nvbd2M

Reviews Rolls-Royce Phantom

4.3 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
The CUPRA Formentor and Tavascan take different approaches to sporty, premium compact SUVs: the Formentor mixes sharp handling with combustion and hybrid powertrains, while the Tavascan is CUPRA’s fully electric, design‑forward coupe‑SUV. This quick comparison will help you choose between the …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Cupra Tavascan and the Skoda Elroq is mostly a question of whether you want a sportier, design-led electric SUV or a more practical, value-focused one. This comparison cuts through the marketing to focus on driving dynamics, range, interior space, technology and running costs …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
CUPRA Tavascan
VW ID.4
VS
The Cupra Tavascan and the VW ID.4 are closely related electric SUVs that take different approaches: the Tavascan leans into sharper styling and a sportier driving character, while the ID.4 prioritises practicality, comfort and broad everyday appeal. If you want dynamic design and a more engaging …
BMW iX1
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
In an exciting showdown between electric SUVs, the BMW iX1 and CUPRA Tavascan both offer distinct qualities tailored to different driving preferences. The iX1 boasts a combination of luxury and innovative technology, making it a strong contender for those seeking advanced connectivity and a premium …
Rolls-Royce Cullinan
Rolls-Royce Phantom
VS
The Rolls-Royce Cullinan and the Rolls-Royce Phantom are two expressions of ultimate luxury: the Cullinan delivers SUV practicality and a commanding presence with genuine off‑road ability, while the Phantom is the definitive full‑size saloon built around serene, chauffeur‑focused comfort and …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Cupra Tavascan and Skoda Enyaq are both electric SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, but they target different buyers: the Tavascan focuses on sporty design and driving dynamics, while the Enyaq emphasizes practicality, interior space and value. This comparison will show where each model excels so …
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Tavascan, two compact electric crossovers that blend practicality with distinctive styling. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, interior quality and value to help you choose which fits your needs.
CUPRA Tavascan
Rolls-Royce Phantom

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 50,500 £
Price
445,700 - 514,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
15.5 - 15.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
441 - 557 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
351 - 361 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,096 - 2,273 kg
Curb weight
2,560 - 2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
540 L
Trunk capacity
548 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,861 mm
Width
2,018 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
507 - 518 kg
Payload
390 - 440 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
571 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 545 Nm
Torque
900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
420 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2022
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drive types are available for the CUPRA Tavascan?

The CUPRA Tavascan is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.