Compare performance (272 HP vs 400 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Audi A3 Sportback?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the fiercely competitive automotive market, the Audi A3 Sportback and the CUPRA Terramar present two fascinating options that cater to different tastes and needs. With both models offering advanced technology and impressive performance, car enthusiasts are eager to see how they stack up against each other. We take a closer look at their technical specifications and innovations that help define each vehicle.
Starting with the Audi A3 Sportback, this hatchback embodies a sleek and sophisticated design, making it an attractive option for those seeking a compact yet stylish vehicle. On the other hand, the CUPRA Terramar, classified as an SUV, offers a more rugged and robust aesthetic. This body type appeals to those needing additional space and versatility for urban commuting or family outings.
The A3 Sportback presents a range of engine configurations, including petrol, diesel, plug-in hybrid, and petrol mild-hybrid options, delivering power levels from 116 HP to a potent 400 HP. The smallest variant still manages an impressive 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 10.1 seconds, while the high-performance variant clocks in at a staggering 3.8 seconds.
Conversely, the CUPRA Terramar offers a slightly more limited engine lineup with petrol, petrol mild-hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options, producing between 150 HP and 272 HP. With a 0-100 km/h time as low as 5.3 seconds, the Terramar proves to be a noteworthy competitor, combining power and efficiency in a larger format.
The A3 Sportback comes with both manual and automatic transmission choices, including a dual-clutch automatic option. Its versatile drive types, including front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive, cater to a range of driving preferences and conditions. In comparison, the CUPRA Terramar exclusively offers dual-clutch automatic transmissions with front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, ensuring a seamless driving experience.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Audi A3 Sportback shines, with an average consumption of just 4.8L/100 km for its most economical diesel variant. The hybrid model also boasts an impressive electric range of 139 km, making it an excellent choice for eco-conscious drivers.
The CUPRA Terramar, while slightly less efficient, brings versatility to the table. Its petrol variants range from 6.1L/100 km to 8.5L/100 km. However, it benefits from a plug-in hybrid option that bridges the gap in efficiency, producing only 10 g/km in CO2 emissions.
Both the A3 Sportback and CUPRA Terramar comfortably seat five passengers; however, the Terramar offers a distinct advantage in interior space with its trunk capacity reaching up to 540 liters. The A3 provides a solid 380 liters of space, which is still commendable for a hatchback. Inside, the Audi is renowned for its high-quality materials and refined finish, while the CUPRA presents a sportier, performance-oriented cabin that emphasizes driver engagement.
Safety is paramount in both models. The A3 Sportback is equipped with an array of advanced safety features, including adaptive cruise control, lane-keeping assist, and enhanced airbag systems. Similarly, the CUPRA Terramar integrates modern safety technologies but adds a sporty twist with features like launch control and various driving modes tailored for performance enthusiasts.
Choosing between the Audi A3 Sportback and the CUPRA Terramar ultimately comes down to personal preferences. The A3 Sportback excels in luxury, efficiency, and compact design, appealing to those looking for sophistication in a hatchback. Yet, the CUPRA Terramar offers a unique blend of sportiness, spaciousness, and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and adventure seekers alike.
Whether you prioritize style, efficiency, or versatility, both models promise impressive performance and innovative technologies. Your choice will reflect your lifestyle and driving ambitions, ensuring that whichever you pick, you'll be driving a vehicle that packs a punch on the road.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Audi A3 Sportback is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,982 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi A3 Sportback uses 1.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the CUPRA Terramar with 1.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A3 Sportback offers slightly more range – reaching up to 141 km, about 23 km more than the CUPRA Terramar.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A3 Sportback offers markedly more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A3 Sportback is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the CUPRA Terramar takes 5.9 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A3 Sportback delivers moderately more torque with 500 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Audi A3 Sportback is markedly lighter – 1,360 kg compared to 1,638 kg. The difference is around 278 kg.
Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers markedly more boot space – 540 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 160 L.
When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries moderately more – 542 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 62 kg.
The Audi A3 Sportback stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.
details
The Audi A3 Sportback wraps premium materials and crisp German design into a practical hatchback package that makes daily driving feel smart rather than showy. It’s nimble in the city, composed on longer trips, and carries just enough swagger to satisfy buyers who want quality without shouting about it.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42,000 - 51,100 £
|
Price
27,000 - 92,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 9.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
Electric Range
134 - 141 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
36 - 191 g/km
|
co2
25 - 211 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
|
Curb weight
1,360 - 1,685 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 380 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,869 mm
|
Width
1,816 - 1,851 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
512 - 542 kg
|
Payload
410 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 400 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 10.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 5
|
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 294 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 2,480 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, F, E, G, B
|
|
Brand
CUPRA
|
Brand
Audi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España