VS

CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda 3 Sedan comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (42,000 £ vs 25,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – CUPRA Terramar or Mazda 3 Sedan?

CUPRA Terramar vs Mazda 3 Sedan: Key differences

CUPRA Terramar

4.9 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • moderately lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Terramar

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda 3 Sedan is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,400 £ , while the CUPRA Terramar costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,534 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the CUPRA Terramar uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.9 L/100km.

3 Sedan

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the CUPRA Terramar offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the CUPRA Terramar is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.1 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the CUPRA Terramar delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

Terramar

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is moderately lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 1,638 kg. The difference is around 221 kg.

Looking at boot space, the CUPRA Terramar offers moderately more boot space – 540 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 90 L.

When it comes to payload, the CUPRA Terramar carries very slightly more – 542 kg compared to 501 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The CUPRA Terramar is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,000
Terramar

CUPRA Terramar

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range 118 km
details

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Formentor
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Choosing between the Cupra Formentor and the Cupra Terramar means deciding whether you want a sporting, head-turning compact crossover or a more conventional compact SUV that leans toward comfort and space. The Formentor emphasizes sharper handling, bold styling and a driver-focused feel, while the …
CUPRA Tavascan
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Cupra Tavascan is Cupra’s all-electric crossover, offering sleek styling and EV-focused tech, while the Cupra Terramar targets buyers who prefer a compact, performance-oriented SUV with a conventional powertrain. This comparison cuts through driving character, practicality, equipment and …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

CUPRA Terramar

The CUPRA Terramar blends the brand’s sporty DNA with the practicality of a compact crossover, offering striking design and a driver-focused, premium-feeling cabin. It’s aimed at buyers who want engaging handling and athletic looks without giving up everyday usability and modern connectivity.

details
IMG_0231
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_07_HQ
CUPRA-unveils-the-Terramar-the-new-hero-of-a-new-era_13_HQ

Reviews CUPRA Terramar

4.9 (9 Reviews)
rate
Max
18 Jun 2026, 06:22:57

Drives great. Responsive. Sporty but relaxed. Fairly intuitive controls. Just a bit more character than the Audi. (I've driven both) and after 2 months and 12,000 km in the Terramar, the Cupra is my favorite

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marcin
4 Jun 2026, 13:13:44

My impressions are based on only a three-day test drive, and they are excellent. The test drive "convinced" me to buy the Cupra Terramar, and I am currently waiting for the model I ordered.

Lawrence
27 May 2026, 23:26:12

Test drove both, Terramar is more liveable for a family as more practical with larger interior space and feels more premium overall. The Formentor in VZ form is super fast and agile and great fun to drive, but feels less premium all round. I also think the Terramar looks nicer inside and out.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
David Burrell
21 Jan 2026, 22:24:34

Had a Terramar for nearly 12 months and it’s proven a great choice. Love the driving experience and that fact it’s less common than Tiguan/Q3 cousins. V2 spec gives you so much kit you don’t need any extras.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Rafał
13 Jan 2026, 21:59:07

A better-equipped version of a car that's technically very similar to the Q3, offered at a more attractive price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
serpimg_ikGkXb

Reviews Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

CUPRA Terramar
Hyundai Tucson
VS
CUPRA Terramar dials up the drama with razor-sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a design that shouts performance — it's the hot-hatch of the SUV world for drivers who actually enjoy twisty roads. The Hyundai Tucson, by contrast, is a sensible all‑rounder: spacious, comfortable and economical, …
BMW X1
CUPRA Terramar
VS
Choosing between the BMW X1 and the CUPRA Terramar comes down to whether you prefer BMW’s refined compact SUV experience or CUPRA’s sportier, performance-focused take on the segment. This comparison highlights the key differences in driving dynamics, interior quality, tech and practicality to help …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar serves up sharp handling, punchy powertrains and a premium, slightly flashy cabin that feels like the hot hatch’s grown-up, wearing an SUV’s clothes. The SEAT Ateca is the sensible alternative — roomier, cheaper to run and refreshingly unpretentious — perfect for buyers who want …
Mazda 2
Mazda 3 Sedan
VS
Choosing between the city‑savvy Mazda2 and the more grown-up Mazda3 Sedan comes down to whether you prioritize low running costs and easy urban manoeuvrability or a roomier cabin, stronger performance and extra tech. I’ll compare the key points — size, engines, economy, equipment and driving feel — …
CUPRA Terramar
Kia Sportage
VS
The CUPRA Terramar attacks the compact-SUV class with sharp handling, brash styling and a sporty, premium edge, while the Kia Sportage plays the sensible rival—roomier, friendlier on the wallet and loaded with mainstream tech. If you want driver-focused thrills and a head-turning look pick the …
CUPRA Terramar
VW Tiguan
VS
The CUPRA Terramar and the Tiguan share roots but aim at different buyers: the Terramar targets sporty, performance-minded drivers while the Tiguan focuses on practicality and family-friendly comfort. This comparison highlights how they differ in driving character, interior space and equipment, …
CUPRA Leon
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The CUPRA León and CUPRA Terramar showcase the brand's commitment to blending performance with practicality. While the León emphasizes sporty handling and agility, the Terramar offers a more spacious and versatile experience without compromising on the exhilarating driving dynamics. Both models …
CUPRA Terramar
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,000 - 51,100 £
Price
25,400 - 34,700 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 8.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
118 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
36 - 191 g/km
co2
123 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,638 - 1,904 kg
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,468 kg
Trunk capacity
450 - 540 L
Trunk capacity
450 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,869 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
512 - 542 kg
Payload
482 - 501 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
CUPRA
Brand
Mazda
Is the CUPRA Terramar offered with different drivetrains?

The CUPRA Terramar is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.