Compare performance (158 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Jogger or Ford Tourneo Connect?
In the competitive world of multi-purpose vehicles (MPVs), the Dacia Jogger and Ford Tourneo Connect are making waves. Both models have been upgraded for 2024, offering enhanced features that cater to families and adventurers alike. In this article, we dive into the technical specifics, performance, and innovations of these two titans of practicality.
The Dacia Jogger, categorized as an MPV, captures attention with its rugged and robust design. Its dimensions are compact enough for city driving, measuring 4547 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1674 mm in height. With the option of five or seven seats, it is tailored for growing families or those needing extra passenger capacity. Not to be outdone, the Ford Tourneo Connect comes as a high-roof wagon, stretching slightly longer with a length range of up to 4868 mm, offering height and width at 1833 mm and 1855 mm, respectively. It seats five, focusing more on cargo with a maximum trunk capacity of 1720 liters compared to Jogger's 607 liters.
The Dacia Jogger is versatile, offering multiple engine options such as full hybrid, LPG, and petrol. With a power output ranging from 91 to 140 HP, it provides a decent punch whether you're opting for manual or automatic gearboxes. The acceleration finds itself moderate with its fastest 0-100 km/h at 9.8 seconds. Alternatively, the Tourneo Connect presents a choice of petrol, diesel, and plugin hybrid engines, delivering power between 102 and 150 HP. A notable advantage is its dual-clutch automatic option, enhancing driving smoothness. Despite its greater power, its acceleration is more leisurely, clocking at 11.4-13.5 seconds to reach 100 km/h.
In terms of consumption, the Jogger's hybrid version is commendable with a consumption of just 4.7 L/100 km. For those mindful of emissions, it maintains CO2 outputs as low as 105 g/km. The Tourneo Connect’s plugin hybrid model impresses further on fuel economy, boasting an exceptional 0.5 L/100 km. Additionally, its CO2 efficiency classes range from B to F, indicative of a broader spectrum of environmental impact considerations.
Both vehicles stand as front-wheel drives, offering stability in typical driving conditions. The Jogger’s ride is characterized by its simplicity and practicality, while the Tourneo Connect offers more modern technologies like the dual-clutch system to refine the driving experience. In terms of safety, both models are equipped with essential features. However, the Tourneo Connect edges forward with advanced driver assistance systems thanks to Ford’s commitment to safety innovation.
Choosing between the Dacia Jogger and the Ford Tourneo Connect hinges largely on your personal needs. The Jogger is an economical choice with flexibility for more passengers, while the Tourneo Connect provides more cargo space and advanced technological features. Both are robust contenders in the MPV segment, offering unique benefits that cater to their respective audience's needs.
Whichever model you lean towards, rest assured that both the Jogger and the Tourneo Connect deliver in terms of utility, comfort, and innovation.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Dacia Jogger is clearly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Ford Tourneo Connect costs 27,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,922 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Dacia Jogger with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Dacia Jogger offers barely more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Dacia Jogger is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Connect delivers considerably more torque with 350 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Dacia Jogger offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Dacia Jogger is visibly lighter – 1,268 kg compared to 1,542 kg. The difference is around 274 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers significantly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 607 L. That’s a difference of about 1,113 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries noticeably more – 818 kg compared to 559 kg. That’s a difference of about 259 kg.
The Ford Tourneo Connect is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Dacia Jogger is a no-nonsense family mover that stretches the idea of value with cavernous practicality and flexible space, perfect for buyers who need a sensible, everyday Swiss Army knife on wheels. It doesn’t try to be glamorous — instead it wins hearts with cheerful thrift, durable materials and honest engineering, giving you useful transport without the pretence.
details
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,400 - 23,500 £
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 7.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
103 - 138 g/km
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
MPV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,268 - 1,463 kg
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
160 - 607 L
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,784 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
384 - 559 kg
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, LPG
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España