Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Dacia Jogger or Ford Tourneo Connect?
In the competitive world of multi-purpose vehicles (MPVs), the Dacia Jogger and Ford Tourneo Connect are making waves. Both models have been upgraded for 2024, offering enhanced features that cater to families and adventurers alike. In this article, we dive into the technical specifics, performance, and innovations of these two titans of practicality.
The Dacia Jogger, categorized as an MPV, captures attention with its rugged and robust design. Its dimensions are compact enough for city driving, measuring 4547 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1674 mm in height. With the option of five or seven seats, it is tailored for growing families or those needing extra passenger capacity. Not to be outdone, the Ford Tourneo Connect comes as a high-roof wagon, stretching slightly longer with a length range of up to 4868 mm, offering height and width at 1833 mm and 1855 mm, respectively. It seats five, focusing more on cargo with a maximum trunk capacity of 1720 liters compared to Jogger's 607 liters.
The Dacia Jogger is versatile, offering multiple engine options such as full hybrid, LPG, and petrol. With a power output ranging from 91 to 140 HP, it provides a decent punch whether you're opting for manual or automatic gearboxes. The acceleration finds itself moderate with its fastest 0-100 km/h at 9.8 seconds. Alternatively, the Tourneo Connect presents a choice of petrol, diesel, and plugin hybrid engines, delivering power between 102 and 150 HP. A notable advantage is its dual-clutch automatic option, enhancing driving smoothness. Despite its greater power, its acceleration is more leisurely, clocking at 11.4-13.5 seconds to reach 100 km/h.
In terms of consumption, the Jogger's hybrid version is commendable with a consumption of just 4.7 L/100 km. For those mindful of emissions, it maintains CO2 outputs as low as 105 g/km. The Tourneo Connect’s plugin hybrid model impresses further on fuel economy, boasting an exceptional 0.5 L/100 km. Additionally, its CO2 efficiency classes range from B to F, indicative of a broader spectrum of environmental impact considerations.
Both vehicles stand as front-wheel drives, offering stability in typical driving conditions. The Jogger’s ride is characterized by its simplicity and practicality, while the Tourneo Connect offers more modern technologies like the dual-clutch system to refine the driving experience. In terms of safety, both models are equipped with essential features. However, the Tourneo Connect edges forward with advanced driver assistance systems thanks to Ford’s commitment to safety innovation.
Choosing between the Dacia Jogger and the Ford Tourneo Connect hinges largely on your personal needs. The Jogger is an economical choice with flexibility for more passengers, while the Tourneo Connect provides more cargo space and advanced technological features. Both are robust contenders in the MPV segment, offering unique benefits that cater to their respective audience's needs.
Whichever model you lean towards, rest assured that both the Jogger and the Tourneo Connect deliver in terms of utility, comfort, and innovation.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Dacia Jogger has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £, while the Ford Tourneo Connect costs 27300 £. That’s a price difference of around 11922 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Tourneo Connect manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Dacia Jogger with 4.70 L. The difference is about 4.20 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Connect has a barely noticeable edge – offering 150 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Dacia Jogger is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 9.80 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.10 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Tourneo Connect performs barely noticeable better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Dacia Jogger tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Tourneo Connect pulls significantly stronger with 350 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Dacia Jogger offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Dacia Jogger is clearly perceptible lighter – 1251 kg compared to 1542 kg. The difference is around 291 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers convincingly more room – 1720 L compared to 607 L. That’s a difference of about 1113 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Tourneo Connect performs clearly better – up to 3105 L, which is about 1286 L more than the Dacia Jogger.
When it comes to payload, Ford Tourneo Connect evident takes the win – 818 kg compared to 582 kg. That’s a difference of about 236 kg.
The Ford Tourneo Connect proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Tourneo Connect is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
The Dacia Jogger is a no-nonsense family mover that stretches the idea of value with cavernous practicality and flexible space, perfect for buyers who need a sensible, everyday Swiss Army knife on wheels. It doesn’t try to be glamorous — instead it wins hearts with cheerful thrift, durable materials and honest engineering, giving you useful transport without the pretence.
details
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15400 - 23400 £
|
Price
27300 - 41900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 7.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
|
|
co2
105 - 137 g/km
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
MPV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1251 - 1460 kg
|
Curb weight
1542 - 1781 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
160 - 607 L
|
Trunk capacity
1213 - 1720 L
|
|
Length
4547 mm
|
Length
4500 - 4868 mm
|
|
Width
1784 mm
|
Width
1855 mm
|
|
Height
1674 mm
|
Height
1833 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1807 - 1819 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2556 - 3105 L
|
|
Payload
393 - 582 kg
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, LPG, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 140 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.8 - 13.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
167 - 174 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
160 - 200 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
67 - 103 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
|
Brand
Dacia
|
Brand
Ford
|
The Dacia Jogger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España