VS

Dacia Jogger vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Dacia Jogger or Mazda CX-60?

Dacia Jogger vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Dacia Jogger

4.3 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Jogger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Dacia Jogger is substantially cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,251 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Dacia Jogger with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 169 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Dacia Jogger takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm more.

Jogger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Dacia Jogger offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Jogger is considerably lighter – 1,268 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 622 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Dacia Jogger offers marginally more boot space – 607 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 37 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries very slightly more – 612 kg compared to 559 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 63 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Jogger and the Dacia Bigster comes down to whether you prioritize flexible seven-seat family practicality and low running costs (the Jogger) or the larger, SUV-styled presence and greater cargo space of the Bigster. I’ll outline their strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Dacia Duster
Dacia Jogger
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Duster and the Dacia Jogger comes down to whether you want a compact SUV with stronger on-road and light off-road ability or a stretched estate focused on space and family practicality. The Duster favours higher ground clearance and a tougher presence, while the Jogger …
Dacia Jogger
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Dacia Jogger

The Dacia Jogger is a no-nonsense family mover that stretches the idea of value with cavernous practicality and flexible space, perfect for buyers who need a sensible, everyday Swiss Army knife on wheels. It doesn’t try to be glamorous — instead it wins hearts with cheerful thrift, durable materials and honest engineering, giving you useful transport without the pretence.

details
d220423p
d220425p
d230002p
d220421p

Reviews Dacia Jogger

4.3 (3 Reviews)
rate
Dave
17 Apr 2026, 11:09:33

the Jogger is spacious and the lack of unnecessary frills and over complex electronics negates frustration and niggles. Practically, it's versatility is great, and the price is unbelievable value.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
FF
3 Feb 2026, 16:18:17

The RAV4's boot is tiny. Pick the Jogger without hesitation — and pay €250 less per month.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.5 (9 Reviews)
rate
andy
31 May 2026, 10:11:44

Not a really functioning vehicle. High fuel consumption and constant electronic problems, the brakes are a joke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Dacia Jogger
Peugeot 5008
VS
Comparing the Dacia Jogger and the Peugeot 5008 pits a no-nonsense, ultra-practical family car against a more polished, comfortably equipped seven-seater. If your priorities are low cost and flexible space the Jogger excels; if you want refinement, tech and a more premium cabin the 5008 is the …
Citroen Berlingo
Dacia Jogger
VS
Choosing between the Citroën Berlingo and the Dacia Jogger comes down to whether you prioritise van-like practicality and clever load solutions or a budget-friendly, car-like seven-seater for family use. The Berlingo excels with a tall, modular cabin and abundant storage, while the Jogger offers …
Hyundai Tucson
Mazda CX-60
VS
Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX‑60 both aim at buyers wanting a versatile SUV, but they take different paths: the Tucson prioritises practicality, efficiency and value, while the CX‑60 leans toward a more premium, refined driving experience with stronger performance. Choose the Tucson for space, tech …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out …
Dacia Jogger
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
15,400 - 23,500 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
103 - 138 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
MPV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,268 - 1,463 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
160 - 607 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,784 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
384 - 559 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, LPG
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 - 158 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
81 - 116 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Dacia
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Dacia Jogger have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.