Compare performance (130 HP vs 243 HP), boot space and price (19,700 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Tipo Hatchback or Ford Kuga?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape of 2024, choosing between compact cars isn't just about picking wheels for the daily commute—it's about finding a companion that matches your lifestyle. Today, we dive into a comparison between two contrasting yet compelling options: the Fiat Tipo Hatchback and the Ford Kuga.
The Fiat Tipo Hatchback embraces the classic hatchback design with a sleek and compact profile. Measuring 4368 mm in length, 1792 mm in width, and 1495 mm in height, it provides a balance between agility and practicality, making it ideal for urban environments.
On the contrary, the Ford Kuga, with its robust SUV design, extends its dimensions to 4615 mm in length, 1882 mm in width, and a towering 1681 mm in height. Its commanding presence on the road is matched by its ability to handle both urban driving and off-road adventures with ease.
The Fiat Tipo Hatchback offers a choice between Petrol MHEV and Diesel engines, providing a power output of 130 HP (96 kW) and achieving 0-100 km/h in as quick as 8.8 seconds. With a dual-clutch automatic or manual gearbox setup, it touts a nimble driving experience that suits city streets. The Tipo reaches a top speed of 208 km/h.
The Ford Kuga elevates versatility with multiple engine types, including Petrol, Full Hybrid, and Plug-in Hybrid. Offering a power range from 150 HP in its petrol variant to an impressive 243 HP in its Plugin Hybrid. Acceleration peaks at 7.3 seconds for the Plugin Hybrid variant, and top speeds reach up to 200 km/h—showcasing impressive versatility for an SUV.
The Fiat Tipo Hatchback presents an efficient choice for the environmentally conscious driver, with consumption figures ranging from 4.7 to 5.4 L/100 km, and CO2 emissions at 122-125 g/km, classifying it in the CO2 efficiency class D.
Conversely, the Ford Kuga, depending on the engine choice, offers varying fuel consumption rates. The Plugin Hybrid stands out with incredibly low consumption of 0.9 L/100 km and a CO2 output of just 20 g/km, placing it in a higher efficiency class B. The electric range capability of the Plugin Hybrid at 69 km further enhances its eco-friendly appeal.
Both models offer seating for five; however, their storage capacities differ. The Fiat Tipo provides a generous trunk capacity of 440 liters, prioritizing practicality within its compact structure.
The Ford Kuga offers slightly less trunk space at 412 liters but compensates with a spacious interior influenced by its SUV design, and a higher payload capacity of up to 550 kg, making it suitable for families and adventurers alike.
The Fiat Tipo Hatchback integrates essential tech for daily commuters seeking simplicity and functionality. Meanwhile, the Ford Kuga leans towards a more tech-savvy audience, particularly with its hybrid variants, offering advanced systems like CVT transmission and substantial battery capacity in the Plugin Hybrid model.
The choice between the Fiat Tipo Hatchback and the Ford Kuga ultimately boils down to individual needs. The Tipo is ideal for urban dwellers seeking efficiency and style in a compact form, while the Kuga caters to those who require versatility and adventure, with an emphasis on eco-efficiency. Both models in 2024 reflect their brand's philosophy and cater to a wide spectrum of modern drivers.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Fiat Tipo Hatchback is clearly cheaper – starting at 19,700 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,537 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Fiat Tipo Hatchback with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers considerably more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Fiat Tipo Hatchback takes 8.8 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Fiat Tipo Hatchback delivers markedly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Fiat Tipo Hatchback is barely lighter – 1,415 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 111 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries visibly more – 550 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.
The Ford Kuga is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Fiat Tipo is a sensible, spacious hatchback that prides itself on practical charm and everyday usability, perfect for buyers who want straightforward value rather than runway drama. It won’t turn heads for flash, but its comfortable ride, clever interior space and low-stress nature make it a smart, grown-up choice with a wink of character.
details
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
19,700 - 25,700 £
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
122 - 125 g/km
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,415 - 1,425 kg
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,368 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,792 mm
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
|
Height
1,495 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
130 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
207 - 208 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,469 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
|
Brand
Fiat
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España