VS

Fiat Tipo Wagon vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (21,000 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Fiat Tipo Wagon or Volvo XC40?

Fiat Tipo Wagon vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Fiat Tipo Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly more efficient
  • slightly lighter
details

Volvo XC40

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tipo Wagon

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Fiat Tipo Wagon is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,000 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,914 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Fiat Tipo Wagon uses 4.7 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 offers noticeably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 67 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Fiat Tipo Wagon takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Fiat Tipo Wagon delivers barely more torque with 320 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

Tipo Wagon

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Tipo Wagon is slightly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 233 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries a bit more – 532 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Fiat Tipo Wagon stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,000
Tipo Wagon

Fiat Tipo Wagon

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
Fiat Tipo Wagon
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Fiat Tipo Wagon

The Fiat Tipo Estate is a no-nonsense family wagon that focuses on practicality and value, with surprisingly generous load space and comfortable seats for long trips. It won't win style awards, but its sensible kit, simple controls and low running costs make it a smart, unfussy choice for buyers who want function over flash.

details
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_05
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_06
210505_F_Fiat_Tipo_SW_13

Reviews Fiat Tipo Wagon

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
G.Piero
8 Apr 2026, 21:55:08

Value for money is its strong point...
Avoid the 3-cylinder petrol and the 1.3 mjt 95 hp — far too little to move 1,500 kg, very sluggish in acceleration.
The only and excellent compromise is the 1.6 mjt2 131 hp; despite weighing 1,500 kg it moves it with plenty of ease and verve (9.5 sec 0–100 km/h), giving real satisfaction.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (5 Reviews)
rate
S. M.
20 Apr 2026, 09:07:56

Excellent

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
The CUPRA Formentor is a punchy, coupe-styled compact SUV whose sharp chassis and spicy engines deliver grin-inducing drive and looks that demand attention; the Volvo XC40 answers with calm Scandinavian poise, clever practicality and safety tech that makes daily life feel worry-free. If you crave …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the extrovert of the pair—bold styling, a quirky, techy interior and strong value that make it a fun crossover to live with, while the Volvo XC40 plays the long game with understated Scandinavian style, class-leading safety and a more premium feel. Pick the 3008 if you want …
Honda ZR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Honda ZR-V impresses with its blend of practicality and sporty handling, making it a strong contender for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its premium interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those who prioritize comfort …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
Volvo EC40 and Volvo XC40 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice …
Fiat Tipo Wagon
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,000 - 27,000 £
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
122 - 125 g/km
co2
148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,470 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
550 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,571 mm
Length
-
Width
1,792 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
1,514 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
475 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
130 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
206 - 207 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 320 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
96 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1,469 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Fiat
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Fiat Tipo Wagon have?

The Fiat Tipo Wagon is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.