Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Bronco vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (335 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Mazda CX-60?
Ford Bronco vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Bronco
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-60 is visibly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 7.5 L/100km.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers very slightly more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Bronco takes 6.7 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers very slightly more torque with 563 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm more.
Bronco
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is noticeably lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 399 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers only slightly more boot space – 570 L compared to 562 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries markedly more – 612 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 201 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Ford Bronco
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Bronco
The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Ford Bronco
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
257 - 288 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
387 - 411 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
335 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
563 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
6
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
246 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.