VS

Ford Bronco vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (335 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (58,200 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Bronco or Nissan Juke?

Ford Bronco vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

Ford Bronco

  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bronco

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Nissan Juke is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Bronco costs 58,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36,857 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Bronco with 11.3 L/100km. The difference is about 6.6 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Bronco offers considerably more power – delivering 335 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 192 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Bronco is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Bronco delivers significantly more torque with 563 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 363 Nm more.

Bronco

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is clearly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 2,289 kg. The difference is around 1,015 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Bronco offers markedly more boot space – 562 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 140 L.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Juke carries only slightly more – 427 kg compared to 411 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Juke is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
Juke

Nissan Juke

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 114 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.7 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Ford Bronco
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Bronco

The Ford Bronco is a go-anywhere SUV that wraps rugged off-road capability in retro looks and modern tech, promising weekend warriors a grin from first mud splash to last campfire. With removable roofs and doors, a surprisingly polished cabin for everyday life and a wide range of trims, it’s as happy tackling trails as it is turning heads on the school run — adventure with attitude.

details
FordBronco_CGrey_Dynamic_5-LOW
FordBronco_HPRed_Static_V9-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_03-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS_04-LOW
2023_FORD_BRONCO_BADLANDS__INTERIOR_28-LOW

Reviews Ford Bronco

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Jeep Avenger
Nissan Juke
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Nissan Juke comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with Jeep’s rugged styling and practical options or the Juke’s quirky, city-focused design and agile handling. Below I’ll highlight the key differences in space, performance, efficiency and …
Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Nissan Juke
Suzuki Swift
VS
Nissan Juke and Suzuki Swift go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Juke
VS
The Kona and the Juke are two of the most popular subcompact crossovers, each standing out with bold styling and a city-friendly footprint. This quick comparison looks at how the Kona and Juke stack up on comfort, practicality, performance and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Ford Bronco
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,200 - 60,000 £
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
Consumption L/100km
11.3 - 12.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
257 - 288 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Off-Roader
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,289 - 2,418 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
504 - 562 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,928 - 1,937 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
387 - 411 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
563 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
246 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
2,694 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
Is the Ford Bronco offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Bronco is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.