VS

Ford Explorer EV vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Ford Explorer EV vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Ford Explorer EV

4.7 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • clearly more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Explorer EV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Explorer EV is significantly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 241,200 £.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 260 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Explorer EV takes 5.3 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers visibly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 221 Nm more.

Explorer EV

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Explorer EV is noticeably lighter – 1,996 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 664 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers somewhat more boot space – 555 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries noticeably more – 840 kg compared to 585 kg. That’s a difference of about 255 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Explorer EV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 - 602 km
Ford Explorer EV
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Explorer EV

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Ford Explorer EV
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
472 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,872 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
531 - 585 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.