VS

Ford Explorer EV vs Skoda Epiq comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 211 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 22,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or Skoda Epiq?

Ford Explorer EV vs Skoda Epiq: Key differences

Ford Explorer EV

4.8 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Epiq

  • substantially cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • markedly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Explorer EV

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Epiq is substantially cheaper – starting at 22,200 £ , while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,000 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Epiq is very slightly more efficient: consuming 13.7 kWh/100km compared to 14.6 kWh/100km for the Ford Explorer EV. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers visibly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 162 km more than the Skoda Epiq.

Epiq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 211 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Skoda Epiq takes 7.1 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 389 Nm more.

Explorer EV

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Epiq is markedly lighter – 1,625 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 371 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Epiq offers very slightly more boot space – 475 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 3 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries clearly more – 585 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 130 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Explorer EV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 - 602 km
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Explorer EV

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

details

Skoda Epiq

The Skoda Epiq is a sensible, well-packaged compact SUV that delivers a roomy cabin, practical storage and an easygoing driving character suited to everyday life. It prioritizes comfort and value with smart, user-friendly features rather than flashy performance.

details
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Epiq

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
Price
22,200 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.7 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
Electric Range
310 - 440 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
Curb weight
1,625 - 1,642 kg
Trunk capacity
472 L
Trunk capacity
475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,872 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
531 - 585 kg
Payload
438 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Power HP
116 - 211 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
267 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Power kW
85 - 155 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.