Compare performance (280 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (27,500 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Focus or MG MG3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
When it comes to hatchbacks, the competition is fierce, with each manufacturer vying for the top spot in terms of performance, efficiency, and modern-day tech innovations. Today, we pit the dynamic Ford Focus against the charismatic MG3, shedding light on their technical prowess and what makes them tick.
The Ford Focus comes with a variety of engine options, including petrol MHEV, diesel, and petrol variants. With power outputs ranging from 115 to an impressive 280 HP, the Focus offers flexibility for those craving performance and efficiency. Notably, its top-tier model zooms from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.7 seconds, making it a compelling choice for speed enthusiasts.
In contrast, the MG3 offers two distinct engine choices: a full hybrid and a conventional petrol. Its engines deliver power outputs of 116 and 194 HP, respectively. The MG3 can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in 8 seconds—this zestful performance balances well with its economical fuel consumption of 4.4 L/100km in the hybrid model.
The Ford Focus is available with manual, dual-clutch automatic, and automatic gearboxes, providing diverse options tailored to driver preferences. Front-wheel drive is standard across all models, guaranteeing good traction and stability.
Similarly, the MG3 is equipped with both manual and automatic transmissions, with a front-wheel-drive system. The focus is on user-friendliness and ease of control, aligning with modern driving expectations.
In terms of efficiency, the Ford Focus clocks a consumption range of 4.9 to 8 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions are rated in the D and G efficiency classes, with emissions varying from 117 to 183 g/km depending on the model and configuration.
The MG3 stands out with its hybrid variant, showcasing a standout consumption rate of 4.4 L/100km and achieving CO2 emission ratings in the C and E classes, with 100 to 137 g/km. Its environmental footprint is notably eco-friendlier thanks to the hybrid option.
Design-wise, the Ford Focus flaunts a sleek profile with a length of up to 4397 mm and a width of 1844 mm, providing ample space for passengers and cargo. Its boot offers a healthy 392 L of trunk capacity, ideal for those spontaneous getaways.
The MG3, more compact in nature with a length of 4113 mm and width of 1797 mm, targets urban dwellers seeking nimbleness and ease of parking. Despite its smaller size, the MG3 still offers practicality with 293 L of trunk capacity.
The Ford Focus emerges as a versatile contender in the hatchback market, furnished with powerful engine options and spaciousness. It's an excellent match for those seeking a dynamic driving experience with a touch of luxury.
On the other hand, the MG3's hybrid option and efficient consumption rates make it a worthy choice for environmentally conscious consumers. For urban cruising with a mix of performance and practicality, the MG3 holds its ground firmly.
In the end, whether you lean towards spirited driving or sustainable commuting, both the Ford Focus and MG3 have something unique to offer. Your choice will hinge on personal priorities and driving habits in this highly competitive segment.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG MG3 is significantly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Ford Focus costs 27,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,094 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Focus with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Focus offers clearly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Focus is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Focus delivers clearly more torque with 420 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 272 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is barely lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 93 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Focus carries slightly more – 560 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.
The Ford Focus stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Focus remains a clever all‑rounder that balances sharp handling with everyday comfort, making it a strong choice whether your commute is city streets or country lanes. Its practical cabin and sensible running costs mean you’ll spend more time enjoying the drive and less time worrying about ownership, with a playful streak underfoot that keeps things interesting.
details
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,500 - 42,700 £
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
117 - 183 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
52 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,529 kg
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
392 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,382 - 4,397 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,825 - 1,844 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
1,438 - 1,482 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,354 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
495 - 560 kg
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 280 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
186 - 250 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 420 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 206 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 2,261 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España