VS

Ford Focus vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (280 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (27,500 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Focus or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Ford Focus vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Ford Focus

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • clearly more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Focus

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Focus is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,500 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 247,886 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Focus uses 4.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 11.1 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 280 HP. That’s roughly 320 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Focus takes 5.7 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 420 Nm. That’s about 480 Nm more.

Focus

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Focus is considerably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,330 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers noticeably more boot space – 555 L compared to 392 L. That’s a difference of about 163 L.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries noticeably more – 840 kg compared to 560 kg. That’s a difference of about 280 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Focus holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,500
Focus

Ford Focus

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 8 L/100km
Ford Focus
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Focus

The Ford Focus remains a clever all‑rounder that balances sharp handling with everyday comfort, making it a strong choice whether your commute is city streets or country lanes. Its practical cabin and sensible running costs mean you’ll spend more time enjoying the drive and less time worrying about ownership, with a playful streak underfoot that keeps things interesting.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Ford Focus
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,500 - 42,700 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
117 - 183 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
52 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,529 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
392 L
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
4,382 - 4,397 mm
Length
-
Width
1,825 - 1,844 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
1,438 - 1,482 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,354 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
495 - 560 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 280 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
186 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 420 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
85 - 206 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 2,261 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.