Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Jeep Grand Cherokee - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (243 HP vs 380 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 85600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Jeep Grand Cherokee?
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Kuga has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Jeep Grand Cherokee costs 85600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 51386 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Kuga manages with 2.80 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Jeep Grand Cherokee with 2.90 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Ford Kuga performs clearly perceptible better – achieving up to 68 km, about 23 km more than the Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Grand Cherokee
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Grand Cherokee has a evident edge – offering 380 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 137 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Grand Cherokee is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jeep Grand Cherokee performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Ford Kuga tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Jeep Grand Cherokee pulls convincingly stronger with 637 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 397 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is decisively lighter – 1526 kg compared to 2434 kg. The difference is around 908 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jeep Grand Cherokee offers clearly perceptible more room – 520 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 108 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Grand Cherokee performs noticeable better – up to 2004 L, which is about 470 L more than the Ford Kuga.
When it comes to payload, Jeep Grand Cherokee to a small extent takes the win – 641 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Ford Kuga proves to be offers a more balanced package and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Ford Kuga is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £34,200
Ford Kuga
Ford Kuga
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Kuga
4.1 (4 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Jeep Grand Cherokee
The Jeep Grand Cherokee wears its trail-ready roots proudly while wrapping them in a surprisingly civilized and upscale package, so it can tackle rough tracks and the school run with the same swagger. Inside, plush materials and intuitive tech make it a comfortable place to spend time, giving buyers a practical yet characterful SUV that doesn’t take itself too seriously.
details
Ford Kuga
Jeep Grand Cherokee
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
85600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.90 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
45 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
65 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
72 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
2434 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
520 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4914 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1968 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1858 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2004 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
641 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
380 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.30 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
637 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
280 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1995 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Jeep
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.