VS

Ford Kuga vs KGM Torres comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or KGM Torres?

Ford Kuga vs KGM Torres: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • considerably more efficient
details

KGM Torres

  • markedly cheaper
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

KGM Torres is markedly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,394 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the KGM Torres with 6.1 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

Torres

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers somewhat more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Torres delivers slightly more torque with 280 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, KGM Torres is barely lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 28 kg.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Torres carries marginally more – 580 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 68 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior …
Ford Kuga
KGM Torres

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
2025_FORD_KUGA_BLACK_PACKAGE_01-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_11-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_09-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_04

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
Marek
15 Jun 2026, 07:10:36

A very sensible car — I like how it looks, it’s well put together, economical on fuel, the interior is comfortable and fairly traditional without any gimmicks, excellent handling, the performance is really good despite it being a large and heavy car; the trunk could be a bit bigger, but it’s still fine — roomy and generally sufficient for family trips, and above all, so far the car has been reliable.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

KGM Torres

The Torres presents a modern, practical take on the SUV, with tidy styling and a focus on day-to-day usability. Its cabin is comfortable and thoughtfully arranged, prioritizing convenience and a composed driving experience.

details
serpimg_yEptnP

Reviews KGM Torres

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga means weighing a sleek, tech‑forward electric from BYD against Ford’s practical compact crossover—their strengths point to very different priorities. I’ll look at performance, range/fuel economy, interior space, practicality and running costs to help you …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Kuga
KGM Torres

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
24,800 - 39,500 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.1 - 9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
139 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,670 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
552 - 580 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
163 - 204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
280 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
120 - 150 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
KGM
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.