VS

Ford Kuga vs Lynk & Co 01 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 36900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Lynk & Co 01?

Kuga

Ford Kuga vs. Lynk & Co 01: An Electrifying Showdown

In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Lynk & Co 01 are two models that stand out, particularly in their innovative approach to hybrid technology. As automakers strive to embrace electrification, both vehicles offer distinct advantages ranging from engine performance to fuel efficiency, making them pivotal options for eco-conscious consumers and driving enthusiasts alike.

01

Powertrain and Performance

The Ford Kuga is available with a variety of engine types including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid configurations. It offers a powerful line-up with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to an impressive 243 HP. With options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, and the choice between a manual gearbox and a continuously variable transmission (CVT), the Kuga caters to a wide array of driving preferences. When it comes to acceleration, the Kuga can go from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty credentials.

On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 01 leans heavily into the electrified realm with its plug-in hybrid architecture. It boasts robust power options reaching up to 276 HP. The Lynk & Co 01 is equipped with a dual-clutch automatic transmission that enhances driving dynamics and efficiency. With an impressive 0-100 km/h time of just 7.7 seconds, it holds its own against the Kuga in the performance department while maintaining a tight focus on eco-friendly driving.

Kuga

Fuel Efficiency and Electric Range

The Ford Kuga demonstrates admirable fuel efficiency with consumption figures as low as 0.9 L/100 km in its hybrid variants. Its electric range can extend up to 69 km, supported by a battery capacity of 14.4 kWh, making it a practical choice for daily commutes with the ability to operate on electric-only power.

In comparison, the Lynk & Co 01 surpasses the Kuga in electric performance, offering an electric range of 75 km and even lower fuel consumption figures of just 0.9 L/100 km. With a slightly smaller battery capacity of 14.1 kWh, it still provides ample support for eco-conscious drivers looking to minimize fuel costs.

01

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both SUVs offer spacious interiors that comfortably accommodate five passengers, with the Ford Kuga featuring a trunk capacity of 412 liters compared to the Lynk & Co 01's slightly larger trunk at 466 liters. The cabin of the Kuga is lauded for its modern design and high-quality materials, ensuring a pleasant driving experience. Ford’s SYNC infotainment system is user-friendly, providing a seamless connection with smartphones and offering various driver-assistance features.

Meanwhile, the Lynk & Co 01 is designed with technology at the forefront. It boasts an intuitive digital dashboard and app connectivity features that integrate with users’ smartphones for a customized experience. The vehicle also emphasizes sustainability with eco-friendly materials in its interior, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers.

Kuga

Safety and Efficiency Ratings

In terms of safety, both models are built with a range of safety features sourced from their respective brands’ commitment to passenger protection. The Ford Kuga offers advanced driver-assist technologies, while the Lynk & Co 01 meets stringent safety standards with its suite of active and passive safety systems.

Efficiency wise, both vehicles are admirable contenders, with the Kuga achieving CO2 emissions as low as 20 g/km in its most efficient hybrid configurations, while the Lynk & Co 01 offers even lower emissions of 20 g/km. This positions both vehicles favorably among eco-conscious buyers aiming to reduce their carbon footprint.

01

Conclusion: Which SUV Comes Out on Top?

Choosing between the Ford Kuga and Lynk & Co 01 ultimately depends on what aspects are most important to you. If you prioritize a diverse engine lineup with excellent driving dynamics, the Kuga is a formidable option. Conversely, if you are leaning towards a high-tech, sustainable vehicle that excels in electric range and connectivity, the Lynk & Co 01 delivers a compelling argument for itself. Both options signify a step toward the future of automotive innovation, each bringing unique strengths to the table.

Ford Kuga vs Lynk & Co 01: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • hardly perceptible cheaper
  • hardly perceptible quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • distinct lighter

Lynk & Co 01

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
  • decisively more efficient
  • minimal more electric range
  • slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Kuga has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2610 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lynk & Co 01 manages with 0.90 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.80 L. The difference is about 1.90 L per 100 km.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 01 performs minimal better – achieving up to 75 km, about 7 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 has a slightly edge – offering 280 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.70 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 01 pulls decisively stronger with 535 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 295 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Kuga is distinct lighter – 1526 kg compared to 1935 kg. The difference is around 409 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Lynk & Co 01 offers slightly more room – 466 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Kuga distinct takes the win – 550 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 01 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Kuga
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.90 L
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details

Ford Kuga

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Lynk & Co 01

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870
381443-side_view-fe0530-original-1615303770
381451-front_interior-54cae9-original-1615303868

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Reviews Lynk & Co 01

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
The verstegen
6 Jan 2026, 09:56:38

Top car.
Quality and price.
Great caravan tow vehicle.
A shame there's so much driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ford Kuga
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
Price
34200 - 46300 £
Price
36900 - 40300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
20 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
Curb weight
1935 kg
Trunk capacity
412 L
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
Length
-
Width
1882 mm
Width
1860 mm
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
415 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
535 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
206 kW
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Lynk & Co

Similar Comparisons

Ford Kuga
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible compact SUV — roomy, practical and built for real-world family duties rather than showpieces, making it an easy buy if you need reliability and space. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is a swooping, tech-heavy concept car: brilliant to admire and full of futuristic …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Ford Kuga
Toyota RAV4
VS
The Ford Kuga feels sporty and keen-legged, with sharper handling and a tech-savvy interior, while the Toyota RAV4 favors rugged practicality, legendary reliability and class-leading hybrid economy. Choose the Kuga if you want driving flair and gadgets, pick the RAV4 if you want lower running costs …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Ford Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver assistance features, making it a top pick for families seeking comfort and safety. Meanwhile, the …
Ford Kuga
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Ford Kuga is the all-rounder that hustles through bends with eager steering and practical space to spare, while the Peugeot 3008 plays the style card with a plush, sculpted interior and a calmer, more refined ride. Pick the Kuga if you want driving engagement and value, choose the 3008 if cabin …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroen C5 Aircross and Ford Kuga go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lynk & Co 01
Lynk & Co 08
VS
The Lynk & Co 01 and Lynk & Co 08 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BMW X1
Ford Kuga
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the BMW X1 and Ford Kuga, the BMW takes the edge with its premium interior quality and dynamic driving experience. However, the Ford Kuga shines with its spacious cabin and advanced safety features, catering to families seeking practicality. Ultimately, choosing …
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?

The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.