VS

Ford Kuga vs Lynk & Co 01 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 36,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Lynk & Co 01?

Ford Kuga vs Lynk & Co 01: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
details

Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kuga

Ford Kuga vs. Lynk & Co 01: An Electrifying Showdown

In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Lynk & Co 01 are two models that stand out, particularly in their innovative approach to hybrid technology. As automakers strive to embrace electrification, both vehicles offer distinct advantages ranging from engine performance to fuel efficiency, making them pivotal options for eco-conscious consumers and driving enthusiasts alike.

01

Powertrain and Performance

The Ford Kuga is available with a variety of engine types including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid configurations. It offers a powerful line-up with power outputs ranging from 150 HP to an impressive 243 HP. With options for both front-wheel and all-wheel drive, and the choice between a manual gearbox and a continuously variable transmission (CVT), the Kuga caters to a wide array of driving preferences. When it comes to acceleration, the Kuga can go from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty credentials.

On the other hand, the Lynk & Co 01 leans heavily into the electrified realm with its plug-in hybrid architecture. It boasts robust power options reaching up to 276 HP. The Lynk & Co 01 is equipped with a dual-clutch automatic transmission that enhances driving dynamics and efficiency. With an impressive 0-100 km/h time of just 7.7 seconds, it holds its own against the Kuga in the performance department while maintaining a tight focus on eco-friendly driving.

Kuga

Fuel Efficiency and Electric Range

The Ford Kuga demonstrates admirable fuel efficiency with consumption figures as low as 0.9 L/100 km in its hybrid variants. Its electric range can extend up to 69 km, supported by a battery capacity of 14.4 kWh, making it a practical choice for daily commutes with the ability to operate on electric-only power.

In comparison, the Lynk & Co 01 surpasses the Kuga in electric performance, offering an electric range of 75 km and even lower fuel consumption figures of just 0.9 L/100 km. With a slightly smaller battery capacity of 14.1 kWh, it still provides ample support for eco-conscious drivers looking to minimize fuel costs.

01

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both SUVs offer spacious interiors that comfortably accommodate five passengers, with the Ford Kuga featuring a trunk capacity of 412 liters compared to the Lynk & Co 01's slightly larger trunk at 466 liters. The cabin of the Kuga is lauded for its modern design and high-quality materials, ensuring a pleasant driving experience. Ford’s SYNC infotainment system is user-friendly, providing a seamless connection with smartphones and offering various driver-assistance features.

Meanwhile, the Lynk & Co 01 is designed with technology at the forefront. It boasts an intuitive digital dashboard and app connectivity features that integrate with users’ smartphones for a customized experience. The vehicle also emphasizes sustainability with eco-friendly materials in its interior, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers.

Kuga

Safety and Efficiency Ratings

In terms of safety, both models are built with a range of safety features sourced from their respective brands’ commitment to passenger protection. The Ford Kuga offers advanced driver-assist technologies, while the Lynk & Co 01 meets stringent safety standards with its suite of active and passive safety systems.

Efficiency wise, both vehicles are admirable contenders, with the Kuga achieving CO2 emissions as low as 20 g/km in its most efficient hybrid configurations, while the Lynk & Co 01 offers even lower emissions of 20 g/km. This positions both vehicles favorably among eco-conscious buyers aiming to reduce their carbon footprint.

01

Conclusion: Which SUV Comes Out on Top?

Choosing between the Ford Kuga and Lynk & Co 01 ultimately depends on what aspects are most important to you. If you prioritize a diverse engine lineup with excellent driving dynamics, the Kuga is a formidable option. Conversely, if you are leaning towards a high-tech, sustainable vehicle that excels in electric range and connectivity, the Lynk & Co 01 delivers a compelling argument for itself. Both options signify a step toward the future of automotive innovation, each bringing unique strengths to the table.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
Peugeot 3008
VS
The Ford Kuga is the all-rounder that hustles through bends with eager steering and practical space to spare, while the Peugeot 3008 plays the style card with a plush, sculpted interior and a calmer, more refined ride. Pick the Kuga if you want driving engagement and value, choose the 3008 if cabin …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Kuga is only slightly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,610 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lynk & Co 01 uses 0.9 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 01 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 75 km, about 7 km more than the Ford Kuga.

01

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 offers a bit more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.7 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lynk & Co 01 delivers considerably more torque with 535 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 295 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is markedly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,935 kg. The difference is around 409 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries clearly more – 550 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lynk & Co 01 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,900
01

Lynk & Co 01

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 280 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 75 km
details
Ford Kuga
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Lynk & Co 01

The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.

details
381453-front_side_view-936758-original-1615303870
381443-side_view-fe0530-original-1615303770
381451-front_interior-54cae9-original-1615303868

Reviews Lynk & Co 01

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
Lee Burkitt
15 Mar 2026, 04:44:31

I have the 01 from 2022 and have had it for 2 years. It's been a lovely car to own and drive. I return from Spain to the UK twice a year in it and it's a pleasure to travel in. The only grip has been the infotainment system which has been buggy and slow. I had the software updated a few weeks ago at the Volvo garage as the over the air option does not work. This has made the infotainment system acceptable now.

It takes a while to get used to the seats for me as the base is quite hard but now I feel they are very confortable. I charge it everyday in the carpark and I use it 90% of the time on electric mode. It does the 70km on a full charge as stated and in petrol mode I'm getting around 16km a litre or 75 a gallon, the engine is only used on motorways.

Aftersales service is patchy here in Spain. My nearest dealer is about a 40 min drive from here, it's not like owning a Renault where there's a dealer everywhere, I've only had to take it there twice, once turned out to be a stone in a brake caliper causing a squeak and the other for the software update.

I highly recommend these cars!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
The verstegen
6 Jan 2026, 09:56:38

Top car.
Quality and price.
Great caravan tow vehicle.
A shame there's so much driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Kuga or the MG HS is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Kuga
Ford Capri
VS
The Ford Kuga is the modern, family-ready compact SUV — sensible, tech-savvy and built for school runs, weekend getaways and minimal fuss. The Ford Capri is the cheeky classic coupe: a slice of retro charisma and driver-focused flair that trades boot space and back seats for pure personality.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
In the highly competitive midsize SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Volvo XC60 stand out for their distinctive approaches to style and performance. While the Kuga excels with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the XC60 offers a luxurious cabin and a refined driving experience. …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Focus
Ford Kuga
VS
The Ford Focus is the sharp, pocket-sized hatchback that rewards anyone who enjoys direct steering, low running costs and a sporty feel on twisty roads, while the Ford Kuga trades that agility for a higher driving position, roomier cabin and SUV practicality that suits families and weekend …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Formentor stands out with its striking design and performance-oriented features, appealing to drivers who crave a sporty edge. In contrast, the Ford Kuga offers a more traditional approach with a focus on practicality, spaciousness, and advanced …
Ford Kuga
Lynk & Co 01

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
36,900 - 40,300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
75 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
20 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,935 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
466 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
415 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
280 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
535 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
206 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Lynk & Co
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.