Compare performance (243 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Mitsubishi ASX?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment has become increasingly competitive, with manufacturers constantly innovating to attract potential buyers. In this detailed comparison, we will explore the key technical aspects and innovations of the Ford Kuga and the Mitsubishi ASX, two popular choices among SUV enthusiasts.
The Ford Kuga shines with a versatile lineup of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. The petrol engines offer a power range from 150 to 243 HP, ensuring that there is a suitable option for every driving style. Notably, the Kuga can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds, making it one of the more spirited performers in its class.
In contrast, the Mitsubishi ASX features a more modest selection of engines. Its power output ranges from 91 to 158 HP, with a maximum acceleration time of 8.5 seconds for the quicker models. While still competent, the ASX’s performance does not quite match the Kuga’s more powerful options.
When it comes to fuel efficiency, the Ford Kuga boasts impressive figures across its various models, with consumption rates as low as 0.9 L/100 km for the hybrid variants. Additionally, its electric range of up to 69 km is a significant advantage for eco-conscious drivers.
The Mitsubishi ASX, on the other hand, delivers competitive fuel economy as well, with its most efficient petrol engine consuming approximately 4.7 L/100 km. While it does not offer the same level of hybrid capabilities as the Kuga, it still provides a sustainable option for buyers looking to minimize their carbon footprint.
In terms of size, the Ford Kuga measures between 4604 and 4645 mm in length, providing ample room for passengers and cargo. With a trunk capacity of 412 liters, it strikes a commendable balance between utility and space. The vehicle's height of 1675 mm also contributes to a commanding driving position.
The Mitsubishi ASX is a more compact option at 4239 mm long, which can be beneficial for urban driving and parking. It offers a trunk capacity of 484 liters, slightly outweighing the Kuga in terms of storage space. However, its reduced height of 1575 mm may compromise some visibility compared to the Kuga.
Both SUVs come loaded with a variety of technological features. The Ford Kuga includes advanced safety and driver-assistance systems, such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, enhancing the overall driving experience. Furthermore, its infotainment system supports seamless smartphone integration, making it user-friendly and tech-savvy.
The Mitsubishi ASX also provides a range of modern features, including a dual-clutch automatic gearbox option and an intuitive infotainment system. However, it may lack some of the more advanced safety features found in the Kuga, which could be a deciding factor for safety-conscious consumers.
Both the Ford Kuga and Mitsubishi ASX have their unique strengths, catering to different consumer needs. The Kuga is ideal for drivers seeking high performance, hybrid technology, and cutting-edge safety features. In contrast, the ASX appeals to those looking for a compact SUV with decent performance and practicality.
Keen buyers should weigh their options based on personal preferences, lifestyle, and intended use. With both vehicles representing solid choices in the competitive SUV market, the decision ultimately comes down to which attributes matter most to the individual driver.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mitsubishi ASX is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,480 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers noticeably more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 85 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi ASX delivers very slightly more torque with 245 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is slightly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 230 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries moderately more – 550 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.
The Ford Kuga is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.
details
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
99 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
397 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España