VS

Ford Kuga vs Nissan Townstar Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 29,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Nissan Townstar Compact Van?

Ford Kuga vs Nissan Townstar Compact Van: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
details

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

  • moderately cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Townstar Compact Van is moderately cheaper – starting at 29,500 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,785 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Townstar Compact Van with 6.6 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van offers clearly more range – reaching up to 263 km, about 195 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Townstar Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers clearly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 113 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Townstar Compact Van delivers marginally more torque with 245 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Townstar Compact Van is barely lighter – 1,399 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 127 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van carries clearly more – 775 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 225 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 68 km
Ford Kuga
Nissan Townstar Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

The Nissan Townstar is a smart, no-nonsense compact van that makes city running and tight deliveries feel almost effortless thanks to tidy packaging and clever storage. It keeps things sensible on the wallet and the road, offering a comfortable driving position and useful tech without flashy frills — the kind of workhorse you'll actually enjoy parking at the kerb.

details
Ford Kuga
Nissan Townstar Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
29,500 - 37,500 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
263 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
0 - 155 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,399 - 1,908 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
571 - 775 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.