VS

Ford Kuga vs Omoda 9 comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 537 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 45,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Omoda 9?

Ford Kuga vs Omoda 9: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Omoda 9

  • significantly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Kuga is markedly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Omoda 9 costs 45,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,100 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 9 uses 1.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Omoda 9 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 145 km, about 77 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Kuga

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 9 offers significantly more power – delivering 537 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 294 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 9 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 9 delivers considerably more torque with 650 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,270 kg. The difference is around 744 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries somewhat more – 550 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 103 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 9 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£45,342
default

Omoda 9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 537 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 145 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
2025_FORD_KUGA_BLACK_PACKAGE_01-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_11-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ACTIVE_09-LOW
2023_FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_04

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Omoda 9

The Omoda 9 blends bold, contemporary styling with a surprisingly spacious and well-appointed interior that punches above its class. It offers a composed, comfortable ride and modern infotainment and safety features that make it a strong choice for buyers wanting a practical yet stylish family crossover.

details

Reviews Omoda 9

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga means weighing a sleek, tech‑forward electric from BYD against Ford’s practical compact crossover—their strengths point to very different priorities. I’ll look at performance, range/fuel economy, interior space, practicality and running costs to help you …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-60 take different approaches to the family SUV: the Kuga focuses on practicality, value and efficient powertrains, while the CX-60 aims for a more premium feel with stronger driving dynamics and a refined cabin. Choose the Kuga for everyday versatility and lower running …
Citroen C5 Aircross
Ford Kuga
VS
Citroën C5 Aircross pampers occupants with pillowy seats, a supremely comfortable ride and playful French styling, while the Ford Kuga answers with sharper handling, classier tech and a more engaging range of engines. If you value long‑distance plushness, pick the Aircross; if you want a sportier …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
Ford Kuga
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
145 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
38 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,270 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
471 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
537 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
395 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Ford
Brand
Omoda
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.