Compare performance (243 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 34,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Renault Scénic?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Renault Scénic are two vehicles that cater to families and urban adventurers alike. With their respective innovations in technology, efficiency, and spacious design, understanding how they stack up against each other is essential for potential buyers. This article will delve into the specific technical aspects that set these two models apart while highlighting their unique features.
The Ford Kuga offers an impressive range of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plugin hybrid variants. With power outputs ranging from 150 HP to a robust 243 HP, it caters to various performance needs. The Kuga manages efficient fuel consumption, with figures as low as 5.3 L/100km for its hybrid variants. Its acceleration capabilities also impress, boasting a 0-100 km/h time of just 7.3 seconds for its most powerful configuration.
On the other hand, the Renault Scénic is fully electric, featuring two power outputs of 170 HP and 220 HP. Though the maximum speed of 170 km/h is less compared to the Kuga's capabilities, the Scénic excels in range, with electric options providing up to 598 km on a single charge. This makes the Scénic a fantastic option for those seeking an environmentally friendly vehicle without the frequent need for charging.
Innovation is a hallmark of both models, but each takes a different approach. The Kuga is equipped with Ford’s latest SYNC 3 infotainment system, which features an intuitive touchscreen interface compatible with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. High-tech safety features, including adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance, enhance the driving experience while adding peace of mind.
Conversely, the Renault Scénic integrates cutting-edge technology that emphasizes sustainability. Its fully electric powertrain signifies the brand's commitment to reducing carbon footprints. The Scénic also features an advanced regenerative braking system, which helps extend its already impressive electric range and improve efficiency.
When it comes to interior space, the Ford Kuga and Renault Scénic both shine brightly. The Kuga accommodates five passengers and offers a substantial trunk capacity of 412 liters. The spacious cabin feels airy, thanks to Ford's attention to design and practicality, ensuring ample legroom and headroom for passengers.
In contrast, the Renault Scénic stands out with a trunk capacity of 545 liters, making it one of the most spacious options in its segment. The cabin design emphasizes modularity, allowing for clever storage solutions and adaptable seating arrangements. Both vehicles feature comfortable seating, but the Scénic’s efficiency-focused design offers an edge in versatility.
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and Renault Scénic ultimately boils down to personal preferences regarding driving habits and environmental considerations. The Kuga offers traditional combustion and hybrid options for those who prefer versatility and performance, while the Scénic represents a strong choice for eco-conscious drivers looking for electric capabilities paired with maximum space and practicality.
Understanding the benefits and limitations of each model can help prospective buyers make an informed decision that aligns with their lifestyle. Both vehicles reflect their manufacturers’ commitment to innovation and customer satisfaction, ensuring that drivers will find value in either choice.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Kuga is marginally cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Renault Scénic costs 34,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 386 £.
As for electric range, the Renault Scénic offers significantly more range – reaching up to 598 km, about 530 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers slightly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 25 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Renault Scénic takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Scénic delivers somewhat more torque with 300 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is a bit lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,822 kg. The difference is around 296 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries marginally more – 550 kg compared to 518 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.
The Renault Scénic holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.
details
The Renault Scenic is a practical and comfortable family car that prioritises interior flexibility and everyday usability. With a composed ride and clever storage solutions, it suits buyers who want a versatile, easy-to-live-with vehicle for family duties and daily driving.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
34,600 - 44,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
1,822 - 1,927 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,470 mm
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,571 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,670 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
514 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España