VS

Ford Kuga vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 275,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Rolls-Royce Cullinan?

Ford Kuga vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.3 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

  • substantially more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Kuga is considerably cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Cullinan costs 275,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 241,158 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Cullinan with 16 L/100km. The difference is about 13.2 L/100km.

Cullinan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan offers substantially more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 357 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Cullinan delivers significantly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 660 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is significantly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,660 kg. The difference is around 1,134 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Cullinan carries clearly more – 840 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 290 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 68 km
Ford Kuga
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

The Cullinan seamlessly combines the hallmark luxury of Rolls-Royce with the rugged versatility of an SUV, making it a true standout in the automotive landscape. Its impeccably crafted interior envelops passengers in a serene atmosphere, complemented by advanced technology and unparalleled comfort. With its commanding presence on the road, the Cullinan redefines what it means to travel in style without compromising on capability.

details
Ford Kuga
Rolls-Royce Cullinan

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
275,400 - 324,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
16 - 16.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
363 - 380 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,660 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
555 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
2,000 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
840 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.