VS

Ford Kuga vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Suzuki Swace?

Ford Kuga vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Swace is only slightly cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Ford Kuga costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,365 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Suzuki Swace with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Kuga offers significantly more power – delivering 243 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 103 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is marginally lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,526 kg. The difference is around 51 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries visibly more – 550 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 190 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Kuga is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,200
Kuga

Ford Kuga

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 243 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 68 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
Ford Kuga
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.

details
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0085-LOW
ford-kuga-black-edition_exteriores_vignale_14sept2022_0238-LOW
FORD_KUGA_ST-LINE_PHEV_024-LOW

Reviews Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
Richie Wid
3 Apr 2026, 13:13:55

PHEV model — very pleased with the car after 2.5 years. In the summer months it runs practically on electric power alone. The large 2.5‑litre engine is surprisingly frugal, about 0.5 l/mil. Downsides are the ventilation in winter, which causes fogged windows, and that we can now only charge the battery to 80%.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Miguel
19 Oct 2025, 05:54:42

It's a car that strikes an excellent balance between quality and price.

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
BYD Seal U
Ford Kuga
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Ford Kuga means weighing a sleek, tech‑forward electric from BYD against Ford’s practical compact crossover—their strengths point to very different priorities. I’ll look at performance, range/fuel economy, interior space, practicality and running costs to help you …
CUPRA Formentor
Ford Kuga
VS
The Cupra Formentor and the Ford Kuga are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Formentor prioritises sporty driving dynamics and striking design, while the Kuga focuses on comfort, practicality and efficient powertrains. This comparison will cover performance, interior …
Ford Kuga
Ford Explorer EV
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Ford Explorer EV means deciding whether you want a compact, efficient SUV with petrol/hybrid options or a larger, fully electric Explorer that prioritizes range, cabin space and advanced tech. I’ll walk through real-world running costs, driving feel, interior …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Kuga stands out with its stylish design and advanced technology features, appealing to those who prioritize both performance and comfort. On the other hand, the MG ZS offers an impressive value proposition, boasting a spacious interior and a strong …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Ford Kuga
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,882 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Ford Kuga?

The Ford Kuga is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.